05-18-2012, 07:53 PM
05-18-2012, 08:33 PM
i think you are talking about v0.08. however, its already fixed in v0.09 beta. but thanks for reporting anyway!
05-18-2012, 08:54 PM
@atom:: No, he's talking about oclHashcat-lite-0.09, however, it's still not fixed in oclHashcat-lite-0.10b48.
05-18-2012, 09:13 PM
I double checked everything. v0.09. Catalyst 12.2.
Encountered another thing relating to this:
attack mode option not being recognized?
Encountered another thing relating to this:
Code:
C:\oclHashcat-lite-0.09>oclHashcat-lite64.exe -V
0.09
C:\oclHashcat-lite-0.09>oclHashcat-lite64.exe -a
oclHashcat-lite64.exe: unknown option -- a
oclHashcat-lite64.exe: unknown option -- a
C:\oclHashcat-lite-0.09>
attack mode option not being recognized?
05-18-2012, 09:20 PM
oclHashcat-lite does not know about any attack modes. i cant understand the thread at all.
05-18-2012, 09:23 PM
@skalderis:: You fooled me more than you fooled yourself!
oclHashcat-lite doesn't have any attack modes other than brute-forcing, so no -a nor "Attack-modes" reference should be there.
@atom:: This line should be removed from --help of oclHashcat-lite:
oclHashcat-lite doesn't have any attack modes other than brute-forcing, so no -a nor "Attack-modes" reference should be there.
@atom:: This line should be removed from --help of oclHashcat-lite:
Code:
-a, --attack-mode=NUM Attack-mode, see references below
05-18-2012, 09:27 PM
I would blame the absence of a single good source of documentation. I'm all over internet trying to find out how hascat works.
05-18-2012, 09:28 PM
@skalderis: https://hashcat.net/wiki/
@M@LIK: already done in 0.10
@M@LIK: already done in 0.10