Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.

hashcat Forum

Full Version: Lotus HTTP Hash
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Atom, your application is great! Thank you very much! About Lotus hashes... Now salted hashes are widespread, this algo is more secured, so popular and really needed. There is no GPU implementation. Now I'm using john the ripper(dominosec), but it's so slow. I hope you'll change this soon.
+1 for G-hash
(05-06-2010, 09:09 AM)atom Wrote: [ -> ]never heared of this algo. are you sure that this important for a bigger number of users? i try to add it in a later version, but i will give it a lower priority until more users reply to this thread asking for support.

+1 for the dominosec/G-hash format. It is actually still somewhat common among large companies. The older lotus5 type is lower priority as it is more manageable with CPU based crackers. dominosec on john runs around 100k c/s compared to 140M c/s for lotus5.
+1 for the dominosec/G-hash format
The latest SVN source of the Cryptohaze Multiforcer supports unsalted Lotus Domino hashes. Salted support is in the works.
Pages: 1 2