Hello, I want to request the support of
incremental-bruteforce while using the
hybrid attack.
Instead of:
Code:
-a6 %dict% ?d?d
-a6 %dict% ?d?d?d
-a6 %dict% ?d?d?d?d
-a6 %dict% ?d?d?d?d?d
One cute line:
Code:
-a6 %dict% --hy-min=2 ?d?d?d?d?d
Sounds good?
I just found myself wishing for this an hour ago.
This is very hard to implement. More demand?
(06-11-2012, 09:36 AM)atom Wrote: [ -> ]This is very hard to implement. More demand?
Well, I would never "demand" anything
However I think M@LIK has had a good idea there.
A batch file with those lines doesn't give the same results ?
@
proinside:: It does, but I'm trying to save some time + to have one final result of cracked hashes, time, speed and all.
err. I'm currently achieving this by using a loop.
:Label
-a6 %dict% %mask%
%mask% =%mask%?d
Goto label....
Problem solved I reckon. Saves atom a ton of time.
@
blazer:: That's not really a smart idea. And again:
M@LIK Wrote: [ -> ]...I'm trying to save some time + to have one final result of cracked hashes, time, speed and all.
Quote:It does, but I'm trying to save some time + to have one final result of cracked hashes, time, speed and all.
Yes, I see and agree with your point of view.
At least, every new batch line requires the same dictionaire to be scanned,
even if it is faster, but it is in fact a waste of time, energy and, perhaps,
other things.