09-05-2012, 10:23 AM
(09-05-2012, 12:03 AM)blandyuk Wrote: [ -> ]Go ahead, although I now use 1 5870 and 1 5850 nowwill have 3 x 5870s soon and will look at upgrading more after that.
Will update that info, thanks!
Will update that info, thanks!
09-05-2012, 10:26 AM
(09-05-2012, 12:37 AM)M@LIK Wrote: [ -> ]Just a few notes before we dive into the hardcore stuff:
- docs\user_manuals.txt(line_3) is old enough to be removed, or just tag it with "Outdated".
- --help(line_35), you can add " --outfile-format=NUM Define outfile-format for recovered hash, see reference below".
- I'm not sure about this one but you need to check --outfile-format=4, its outputs is always padded with zeros. Try:
Code:echo -n 00 | hc64p --outfile-format=4 b4b147bc522828731f1a016bfa72c073
OK will do, thanks!
09-05-2012, 10:26 AM
(09-05-2012, 12:02 AM)forumhero Wrote: [ -> ]regarding the chart, how about a bar graph? i think it better emphasize an increase in performance, rather than a line graph that's sloping downwards...
OK, I will try and then decide which one to use
09-05-2012, 07:43 PM
OK, rc2 is up with all the suggestions plus also increment mode disabled by default. The handling is now exactly as in maskprocessor/statprocessor. If you want increment mode, add -i.
09-05-2012, 07:45 PM
(09-05-2012, 12:02 AM)forumhero Wrote: [ -> ]regarding the chart, how about a bar graph? i think it better emphasize an increase in performance, rather than a line graph that's sloping downwards...
OK, updated, here is how they look like now:
https://hashcat.net/misc/p009_img/plus89_mh18.png
https://hashcat.net/misc/p009_img/plus89_mh915.png
What you think?
09-05-2012, 08:41 PM
Looks informative and easy understandable for me.
09-05-2012, 10:33 PM
looks great!
09-06-2012, 02:39 AM
Windows7 64-bit, nVidia, 304,79 beta, oclHashcat-plus-0.09-rc2.
About -m's:
-m3000(FAGGOT!): -a0 fails to crack len_6 passwords unless it's piped using echo -n and not a dict. -a1, -a7 appends a char if the pass was len_7, See details here.
-m131: Fails to crack any password containing lowercase char in it, all attack-modes, all lengths.
This bug seems to be present in previous versions as well, but I didn't notice it for some reason. I changed all my plains\hashes now.
- It would much nicer if hashes of algos related to strtolower (-m1100, -m2100 and -m121) does NOT get lowered by force in left list and output. In other words, keeping the username's case as it is.
Other:
- Nothing was done about my previous report.
- If -i is not set, the mask will start AND stop at the first place-holder.
More deep tests are planned.
About -m's:
-m3000(FAGGOT!): -a0 fails to crack len_6 passwords unless it's piped using echo -n and not a dict. -a1, -a7 appends a char if the pass was len_7, See details here.
-m131: Fails to crack any password containing lowercase char in it, all attack-modes, all lengths.
This bug seems to be present in previous versions as well, but I didn't notice it for some reason. I changed all my plains\hashes now.
- It would much nicer if hashes of algos related to strtolower (-m1100, -m2100 and -m121) does NOT get lowered by force in left list and output. In other words, keeping the username's case as it is.
Other:
- Nothing was done about my previous report.
- If -i is not set, the mask will start AND stop at the first place-holder.
Code:
e6d96502596d7e7887b76646c5f615d9:car
hc64p -a3 --force e6d96502596d7e7887b76646c5f615d9 ?l?l?l
Status.......: Exhausted
Input.Mode...: Mask (?l)
...More deep tests are planned.
09-06-2012, 09:45 AM
Quick one, -m 3000 (LM) now only works with 16 char hex hashes, not the full 32 char hex 
Real pain!
Real pain!
09-06-2012, 09:54 AM
Last one to know! xD
"full 32 char hex" are the REAL PAiN!
A nice script will help you in joining and splitting your hashes.
"full 32 char hex" are the REAL PAiN!
A nice script will help you in joining and splitting your hashes.