Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.

hashcat Forum

Full Version: Performace Loss Numbers
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Great job. I am cracking lots of very tough/long passwords now. Is there a minimum driver version that should be used for Nvidia? OclHashcat-plus keeps crashing the driver and I don't know if it is a bug or just the wrong driver (too old). I am using 310.90
Also with b33? Im using 319.x + driver
(06-21-2013, 06:26 AM)atom Wrote: [ -> ]Also with b33? Im using 319.x + driver
It was with b32 and with multi-gpu. Still not sure in which circumstance the crash occurs (attack type, load, etc.).
I am sooooo happy, thank you very much atom >16 support has been on my wish list for a very long time. You have done an amazing job to retain functionality and speed.

Thank you.
i know i'm a bit late to the thread just doing some catchup reading. Not sure if the discussion is still relevant.

Is it possible to scan the rule file first and only tell the rule processor to process those rules and not the unnecessary ones, so you won't lose performance for users who aren't using all the rules.

So I guess either have multiple rule engines and pick the best or have a dynamically initiated rule engine if possible.
Pages: 1 2