hashcat Forum

I was working through a bash script to do email rule generation here is a sample of what it spits out

Code:
$@$0$1$2$.$n$e$t$.$i$l

:$@$0$1$2$.$n$e$t$.$i$l

d$@$0$1$2$.$n$e$t$.$i$l

l$@$0$1$2$.$n$e$t$.$i$l

u$@$0$1$2$.$n$e$t$.$i$l

c$@$0$1$2$.$n$e$t$.$i$l

C$@$0$1$2$.$n$e$t$.$i$l

t$@$0$1$2$.$n$e$t$.$i$l

Are the first 2 lines of that equivalent? If so is there a reason to prefer one over the other?

In a rule its not a big deal but overall I have something like 700 plus domains which just adds up.

Peace

the first two are equivalent.

(08-07-2013, 11:07 PM)undeath Wrote: [ -> ]the first two are equivalent.

Thanks, Ill modify the script and pull blank out and leave the : in.

Peace

liquiz

undeath

liquiz