Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.

hashcat Forum

Full Version: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
(01-15-2014, 06:43 PM)LDA Wrote: [ -> ]Wow, you rock! Awesome.

Can you give me example of 64-bit algorithms? Very interesting subject.

Where come from these numbers? Your tests?

Thanks.

Sha 512 should be an example
(01-15-2014, 06:43 PM)LDA Wrote: [ -> ]Can you give me example of 64-bit algorithms?

as stated in post #7 of this thread, sha512 and sha3 are examples of 64-bit aglorithms.


(01-15-2014, 06:43 PM)LDA Wrote: [ -> ]Where come from these numbers? Your tests?

yes.
In the case of WPA which is 128-bit or even WPA2 (256-bit?) how does this card shape up?
(02-09-2014, 12:32 PM)Bobmarley2021 Wrote: [ -> ]In the case of WPA which is 128-bit or even WPA2 (256-bit?) how does this card shape up?

The heavy stuff in WPA is SHA1, so 32-bit.
(01-12-2014, 09:08 AM)epixoip Wrote: [ -> ]290X is 1-2% faster than a 6990 for 32-bit register-based algorithms, 90% faster for des-based algorithms, and 50% slower for 64-bit algorithms.

What would be the best card today for SAP CODVN B (BCODE) and/or SAP CODVN F/G (PASSCODE).
Can not find out the type? I am thinking of 290(x) or 7970 or 7990. Or is there a better alternative?
When in doubt, buy a 290X.
Pages: 1 2