Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.

hashcat Forum

Full Version: bug in 1.35?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
I hadn't noticed 1.35 was out, so I just downloaded it. I have been using 1.33. But when I ran 1.35, it didn't recover anything, while the same run with 1.33 did. Here are the command lines.

First I ran 1.35:

Code:
C:\<snip>\hashlist>..\cudaHashcat-1.35\cudaHashcat64.exe -a 0 -m 0 --remove -o 32found.txt 32_left_split_5.txt ..\wordlists -r rules\best64.rule --session=5md5best64

Hashes recovered = 0

Then, without changing anything (other than cudahashcat version; I used command history and just changed the 5 to a 3), I ran 1.33:

Code:
C:\<snip>\hashlist>..\cudaHashcat-1.33\cudaHashcat64.exe -a 0 -m 0 --remove -o 32found.txt 32_left_split_5.txt ..\wordlists -r rules\best64.rule --session=5md5best64

Hashes recovered = 294

I repeated this with a different ruleset and got roughly the same results: 1.35 first - 0 recovered, then 1.33 - 6 recovered.

Is this a bug in 1.35 or did something change between 1.33 or 1.35?
Yes, -m 0 is broken in cudaHashcat 1.35. It's also broken in 1.31 - 1.33, though not as severely. Hoping 1.36 will be released real soon.
So bug. Thanks. I guess I stick with 1.33 for now.