02-24-2017, 11:39 AM
I want to try a combinator attack where I combine two dictionaries with a '@' between the words in the dictionaries and add four digits to the end of the combined words, e.g. if
dict1
dict2:
I want the output to be (YYYY for some year):
I've tried using -a 1 with -j '$@' -k '@YYYY', but seems like this only works if -j/-k adds the same amount of characters (e.g. as in the example at https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=combinator_attack) - unless I'm doing it completely wrong of course.
I could append '@' to all the words in dict1 and then combine the modified dict1 with dict2 using combinator before running the rule attack, but before I do that I wonder if there's an easier way? Doing it this way could lead to a quite large combined dictionary that'd take up quite some disk space if dict1 and dict2 both contain a decent amount of words.
Even better if it's possible to do -k '$?d $?d $?d $?d' so I could try appending all four-digit combinations to word1@word2 without having to manually specify YYYY for each attack I do. If that's asking for too much I'll just do the attack in a loop where YYYY is incremented for each iteration.
dict1
Code:
cat
dog
cardict2:
Code:
coke
sprite
fantaI want the output to be (YYYY for some year):
Code:
cat@cokeYYYY
cat@spriteYYYY
.
.
car@fantaYYYYI've tried using -a 1 with -j '$@' -k '@YYYY', but seems like this only works if -j/-k adds the same amount of characters (e.g. as in the example at https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=combinator_attack) - unless I'm doing it completely wrong of course.
I could append '@' to all the words in dict1 and then combine the modified dict1 with dict2 using combinator before running the rule attack, but before I do that I wonder if there's an easier way? Doing it this way could lead to a quite large combined dictionary that'd take up quite some disk space if dict1 and dict2 both contain a decent amount of words.
Even better if it's possible to do -k '$?d $?d $?d $?d' so I could try appending all four-digit combinations to word1@word2 without having to manually specify YYYY for each attack I do. If that's asking for too much I'll just do the attack in a loop where YYYY is incremented for each iteration.