01-18-2018, 07:32 PM
Pages: 1 2
01-18-2018, 07:37 PM
And final questions...
this is v3 wallet with scrypt... so no chance amd 8 gb ram will work (because CU?) with that... right?
1080 will work because use SM and is better but not much faster?
How about ryzen cpu ? or new i9 ?
im trying -D 1 ... but segmention faults on my cpu...
-------------------------------------------------
i switch pc and now i have:
hashcat (v4.0.1-84-g7c1fb01) starting...
OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
================================================
* Device #1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3840QM CPU @ 2.80GHz, 7937/31748 MB allocatable, 8MCU
OpenCL Platform #2: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
* Device #2: Quadro K1000M, skipped.
and i want to try device 1 cpu
when i tried hash and dictoniary... its trying to start but
Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts
Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
Rules: 1
Applicable optimizers:
* Zero-Byte
* Single-Hash
* Single-Salt
Password length minimum: 0
Password length maximum: 256
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Initializing device kernels and memory...Segmentation fault
when u try quadro gpu it loads dictrionary... but exhausted... to low gpu memory... but why CPU doesnt work?
when i start default i see this:
* Device #1: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime. Expect massive speed loss.
You can use --force to override, but do not report related errors.
* Device #2: This hardware has outdated CUDA compute capability (3.0).
For modern OpenCL performance, upgrade to hardware that supports
CUDA compute capability version 5.0 (Maxwell) or higher.
* Device #2: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled.
This may cause "CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES" or related errors.
To disable the timeout, see: https://hashcat.net/q/timeoutpatch
maybe this is a problem?
this is v3 wallet with scrypt... so no chance amd 8 gb ram will work (because CU?) with that... right?
1080 will work because use SM and is better but not much faster?
How about ryzen cpu ? or new i9 ?
im trying -D 1 ... but segmention faults on my cpu...
-------------------------------------------------
i switch pc and now i have:
hashcat (v4.0.1-84-g7c1fb01) starting...
OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
================================================
* Device #1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3840QM CPU @ 2.80GHz, 7937/31748 MB allocatable, 8MCU
OpenCL Platform #2: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
* Device #2: Quadro K1000M, skipped.
and i want to try device 1 cpu
when i tried hash and dictoniary... its trying to start but
Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts
Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
Rules: 1
Applicable optimizers:
* Zero-Byte
* Single-Hash
* Single-Salt
Password length minimum: 0
Password length maximum: 256
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Initializing device kernels and memory...Segmentation fault
when u try quadro gpu it loads dictrionary... but exhausted... to low gpu memory... but why CPU doesnt work?
when i start default i see this:
* Device #1: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime. Expect massive speed loss.
You can use --force to override, but do not report related errors.
* Device #2: This hardware has outdated CUDA compute capability (3.0).
For modern OpenCL performance, upgrade to hardware that supports
CUDA compute capability version 5.0 (Maxwell) or higher.
* Device #2: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled.
This may cause "CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES" or related errors.
To disable the timeout, see: https://hashcat.net/q/timeoutpatch
maybe this is a problem?
01-18-2018, 11:18 PM
There are a lot of warnings in your output.
Starting from the timeout patch problem to the "Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime" error.
It's not a good idea to ignore all warnings and don't try to fix them.
Intel has a dedicated OpenCL Runtime (not SDK!) page where you can download the Intel OpenCL Runtime for your CPU.
I also just noticed that this confusion about -D/-d might come from blogs like this one: https://stealthsploit.com/2018/01/04/eth...pu-vs-cpu/
There are a lot of people trying exactly that, i.e. run -D 12 or something like that even through it makes absoultely no sense if you read the --help output (-D only allows 3 different values 1, 2 or 3 and this values are not for the device selection but for the type selection). Therefore in my opinion the whole article (all the -D x recommendation etc) needs to be fixed. Maybe someone can contact the author before we get flooded with several "problems" like this one (see original post of this thread).
Starting from the timeout patch problem to the "Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime" error.
It's not a good idea to ignore all warnings and don't try to fix them.
Intel has a dedicated OpenCL Runtime (not SDK!) page where you can download the Intel OpenCL Runtime for your CPU.
I also just noticed that this confusion about -D/-d might come from blogs like this one: https://stealthsploit.com/2018/01/04/eth...pu-vs-cpu/
There are a lot of people trying exactly that, i.e. run -D 12 or something like that even through it makes absoultely no sense if you read the --help output (-D only allows 3 different values 1, 2 or 3 and this values are not for the device selection but for the type selection). Therefore in my opinion the whole article (all the -D x recommendation etc) needs to be fixed. Maybe someone can contact the author before we get flooded with several "problems" like this one (see original post of this thread).
Pages: 1 2