Should I be using a rule instead? - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-28.html) +--- Thread: Should I be using a rule instead? (/thread-8667.html) |
Should I be using a rule instead? - hack_papi - 09-25-2019 Hey all, I am trying to write a mask of specific length such that involves a possible digit appended similar to this '?l?l?l?l?l?l?d' but a bit more complex, the thing is I would also like all entries without the digit to be brute forced too. Should I just write two separate masks: Code: ?l?l?l?l?l?l RE: Should I be using a rule instead? - royce - 09-25-2019 There's no way for a single mask to express optional characters (that I'm aware of). But if you pass a file containing the masks, they are processed in succession very quickly. RE: Should I be using a rule instead? - philsmd - 09-25-2019 Code: hashcat -m 0 -a 3 -w 3 --increment --increment-min 6 hash.txt ?l?l?l?l?l?l?d RE: Should I be using a rule instead? - royce - 09-25-2019 Good point! True for this particular case, but not the more general case. |