Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.
hashcat Forum
GPU Utilization stuck at 2% - Printable Version

+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html)
+--- Thread: GPU Utilization stuck at 2% (/thread-8669.html)



GPU Utilization stuck at 2% - hack_papi - 09-26-2019

Hey all,
I've been following multiple guides trying to up my GPU utilization from 2%, I even tried the tips on the hashcat FAQ but none seem to work either raising GPU util by 10% but lowering my H/ or not working at allĀ , my command is:
Code:
./hashcat64.exe -m 500 -o Assignment01 -a 3 -w 4 --force -O --opencl-device-types 1,2 --increment --increment-min 5 .\hard_dump.txt '?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a'
can anyone suggest a way to increase my utilization? would adding rules work? thank you


RE: GPU Utilization stuck at 2% - philsmd - 09-26-2019

let's start with removing the --force



if you use your CPU power together with your GPU it could be worse in some very specific situations (of course also depending on your hardware and hash type etc). What happens if you only use the GPU (i.e. running it without -D 1,2)


RE: GPU Utilization stuck at 2% - hack_papi - 09-27-2019

(09-26-2019, 04:40 PM)philsmd Wrote: let's start with removing the --force



if you use your CPU power together with your GPU it could be worse in some very specific situations (of course also depending on your hardware and hash type etc). What happens if you only use the GPU (i.e. running it without -D 1,2)

There was no change really still stuck between %0-%4.


RE: GPU Utilization stuck at 2% - philsmd - 09-27-2019

what hardware ? which drivers ? more info alltogether would be nice

does it work with other hash types or older hashcat versions ? did you try the beta version from https://hashcat.net/beta/ ?

did you run the benchmark with --benchmark -m 500 ?