RE: Nvidia 3080 benchmarks - NoReply - 09-25-2020
Full benchmark is now available (credits to Chick3nman):
https://gist.github.com/Chick3nman/bb22b28ec4ddec0cb5f59df97c994db4
RE: Nvidia 3080 benchmarks - radix - 09-25-2020
Setup there was using cuda 11.1.0 and driver version 455.23.05, some of the scrypt based kernels failed with memory allocation, but everything else worked just fine.
RE: Nvidia 3080 benchmarks - dismal - 09-25-2020
disappointing...
RE: Nvidia 3080 benchmarks - azaran - 09-25-2020
(09-25-2020, 10:26 AM)radix Wrote: Setup there was using cuda 11.1.0 and driver version 455.23.05, some of the scrypt based kernels failed with memory allocation, but everything else worked just fine.
Do you plan to do OCL benchmark for the comparison of OCL vs CUDA performance on this new GPU architecture?
RE: Nvidia 3080 benchmarks - gs135269 - 09-26-2020
After seeing this benchmark test, I found that the RTX3080 did not improve much compared to 1080ti. Although the benchmark test speed of the RTX3080 after 4 years and 2 updates has not improved much, I remember that the floating point calculation of the new generation 3080 graphics card has 30t. From this, the 3080 benchmark test should be three times as much as 1080ti, and then most hashes only increase the speed by one-third.
RE: Nvidia 3080 benchmarks - devilsadvocate - 09-27-2020
Just curious, has anyone attempted overclocking and experienced their 30 series cards crashing?
It seems that the 3080 has some design flaws from some manufacturers.
https://youtu.be/x6bUUEEe-X8
RE: Nvidia 3080 benchmarks - Sondero - 10-05-2020
Hello,
every time i start a benchmark it crashes on Hashmode 400 is there a fix for the RTX3000 series ?
BTW. with the newst drivers the results looks a few % better than the postet one.
Code: hashcat (v6.1.1) starting in benchmark mode...
Benchmarking uses hand-optimized kernel code by default.
You can use it in your cracking session by setting the -O option.
Note: Using optimized kernel code limits the maximum supported password length.
To disable the optimized kernel code in benchmark mode, use the -w option.
* Device #1: CUDA SDK Toolkit installation NOT detected.
CUDA SDK Toolkit installation required for proper device support and utilization
Falling back to OpenCL Runtime
* Device #1: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled.
This may cause "CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES" or related errors.
To disable the timeout, see: https://hashcat.net/q/timeoutpatch
OpenCL API (OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 11.1.70) - Platform #1 [NVIDIA Corporation]
=======================================================================
* Device #1: GeForce RTX 3080, 9088/10240 MB (2560 MB allocatable), 68MCU
OpenCL API (OpenCL 2.1 WINDOWS) - Platform #2 [Intel(R) Corporation]
====================================================================
* Device #2: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core Processor, skipped
Benchmark relevant options:
===========================
* --benchmark-all
* --optimized-kernel-enable
Hashmode: 0 - MD5
Speed.#1.........: 57378.8 MH/s (39.55ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 10 - md5($pass.$salt)
Speed.#1.........: 57000.4 MH/s (39.83ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 11 - Joomla < 2.5.18
Speed.#1.........: 50537.1 MH/s (44.95ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 12 - PostgreSQL
Speed.#1.........: 50346.1 MH/s (45.14ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 20 - md5($salt.$pass)
Speed.#1.........: 31577.8 MH/s (72.07ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 21 - osCommerce, xt:Commerce
Speed.#1.........: 31572.9 MH/s (72.04ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 22 - Juniper NetScreen/SSG (ScreenOS)
Speed.#1.........: 31485.4 MH/s (72.29ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 23 - Skype
Speed.#1.........: 31343.2 MH/s (72.60ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 30 - md5(utf16le($pass).$salt)
Speed.#1.........: 53546.9 MH/s (42.38ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 40 - md5($salt.utf16le($pass))
Speed.#1.........: 31490.7 MH/s (72.28ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 50 - HMAC-MD5 (key = $pass)
Speed.#1.........: 9393.9 MH/s (60.52ms) @ Accel:8 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 60 - HMAC-MD5 (key = $salt)
Speed.#1.........: 19925.1 MH/s (57.07ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 100 - SHA1
Speed.#1.........: 18973.2 MH/s (59.78ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 101 - nsldap, SHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SHA
Speed.#1.........: 18974.4 MH/s (59.84ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 110 - sha1($pass.$salt)
Speed.#1.........: 19032.2 MH/s (59.70ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 111 - nsldaps, SSHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SSHA
Speed.#1.........: 18729.1 MH/s (60.59ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 112 - Oracle S: Type (Oracle 11+)
Speed.#1.........: 18667.4 MH/s (60.77ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 120 - sha1($salt.$pass)
Speed.#1.........: 14525.6 MH/s (78.32ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 121 - SMF (Simple Machines Forum) > v1.1
Speed.#1.........: 14450.4 MH/s (78.72ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 122 - macOS v10.4, macOS v10.5, MacOS v10.6
Speed.#1.........: 14442.3 MH/s (78.75ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 124 - Django (SHA-1)
Speed.#1.........: 14442.1 MH/s (78.80ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 125 - ArubaOS
Speed.#1.........: 14443.0 MH/s (78.81ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 130 - sha1(utf16le($pass).$salt)
Speed.#1.........: 18969.9 MH/s (59.96ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 131 - MSSQL (2000)
Speed.#1.........: 18928.4 MH/s (60.07ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 132 - MSSQL (2005)
Speed.#1.........: 18903.8 MH/s (60.09ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 133 - PeopleSoft
Speed.#1.........: 18899.6 MH/s (60.18ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 140 - sha1($salt.utf16le($pass))
Speed.#1.........: 13844.1 MH/s (82.22ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 141 - Episerver 6.x < .NET 4
Speed.#1.........: 13205.0 MH/s (86.03ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 150 - HMAC-SHA1 (key = $pass)
Speed.#1.........: 4232.5 MH/s (67.04ms) @ Accel:8 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 160 - HMAC-SHA1 (key = $salt)
Speed.#1.........: 7981.8 MH/s (71.28ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 200 - MySQL323
Speed.#1.........: 150.1 GH/s (14.97ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 300 - MySQL4.1/MySQL5
Speed.#1.........: 8257.2 MH/s (68.78ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Hashmode: 400 - phpass (Iterations: 2048)
clEnqueueNDRangeKernel(): CL_MEM_OBJECT_ALLOCATION_FAILURE
Started: Mon Oct 05 13:22:21 2020
Stopped: Mon Oct 05 13:25:31 2020
RE: Nvidia 3080 benchmarks - etherion - 10-05-2020
how much power at the wall?
RE: Nvidia 3080 benchmarks - Sondero - 10-05-2020
(10-05-2020, 04:22 PM)etherion Wrote: how much power at the wall?
What do you mean with "power at the wall" ?
RE: Nvidia 3080 benchmarks - etherion - 10-06-2020
(10-05-2020, 06:32 PM)Sondero Wrote: (10-05-2020, 04:22 PM)etherion Wrote: how much power at the wall?
What do you mean with "power at the wall" ? so at the wall is a plug right? most houses or office uses plugs. The questions is what is the difference in power when gpu is not running and running measured at the wall.
|