|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Oracle 11g Format
Post: RE: Oracle 11g Format
| Atom, the Oracle 11g format is 160 bits / 40 hex characters of SHA1 and 80 bits / 20 hex characters of salt. 40 bits / 10 hex characters of salt is insufficient.
Please see https://www.petefinnigan.... |
|
flipit |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
27,478 |
04-09-2012, 01:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Oracle 11g Format
Post: RE: Oracle 11g Format
| Undeath, that wouldn't work, as --hex-salt is already implied by the hash type (-m 112).
Atom, is it possible to expand the max length for the salt or is it a remnant from optimizing for a differen... |
|
flipit |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
27,478 |
04-09-2012, 12:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Oracle 11g Format
Post: RE: Oracle 11g Format
| Awesome, that explains why I was getting the line length exceptions.
However, there seems to be one small problem. Oracle uses 10 bytes of hex salt, yet oclHashcat seems hard-coded to accept up to ... |
|
flipit |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
27,478 |
04-06-2012, 02:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Oracle 11g Format
Post: RE: Oracle 11g Format
| Hmm. Let's say we have a user named foo with a hash "S:123456789A123456789B123456789C123456789D123456789E123456789F".
The proper format would be oclHashcat-plus -m 112 123456789A123456789B123456789... |
|
flipit |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
27,478 |
04-06-2012, 01:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Oracle 11g Format
Post: Oracle 11g Format
| I am having trouble loading Oracle 11g hashes (type 112) in to oclhashcat-plus.
They are stored in the SYS.USER$.spare4 column and are of the form of 'S:' followed by 40 characters of hex SHA1 hash... |
|
flipit |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
27,478 |
04-05-2012, 05:12 PM |
