|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: 5970 slow?
Post: RE: 5970 slow?
|
atom Wrote: (04-19-2013, 10:49 AM)
--
I dont get what the problem is here. The numbers shown are the ones to expect.
--
Hi Atom! There's no problem really other than my misunderstanding. If you wan... |
|
uzomoshi |
Hardware
|
12 |
22,910 |
04-19-2013, 12:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 5970 slow?
Post: RE: 5970 slow?
| This is my benchmark 825/1010. I had to set --cpu-accel=240 instead of 800 because every run was killed. I guess due to insufficient memory (I got 1Gb ram). Results are comparable though and the small... |
|
uzomoshi |
Hardware
|
12 |
22,910 |
04-19-2013, 10:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 5970 slow?
Post: RE: 5970 slow?
| Hi epixoip, your rig is outstanding! Yes I've considered everything you just mentioned. I know lite is faster and never meant to compare it to plus. Just compare lite results with lite results, like 6... |
|
uzomoshi |
Hardware
|
12 |
22,910 |
04-15-2013, 10:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 5970 slow?
Post: RE: 5970 slow?
| Could you explain a little bit why you say it's normal? I read everywhere that 6990 is only slightly better than 5970. Golubev estimation is about 15% better. It looks even less in real benchmarks lik... |
|
uzomoshi |
Hardware
|
12 |
22,910 |
04-15-2013, 12:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 5970 slow?
Post: 5970 slow?
| Sapphire 5970, ubuntu 12.10 amd64, kernel 3.5.0-27, catalyst 13.1
Code:
--
oclHashcat-plus64.bin --gpu-loops 1024 --gpu-accel 160 -m 120 -a 3 -o test-out.txt test.txt ?a?a?a?a?a?a
--
after a couple... |
|
uzomoshi |
Hardware
|
12 |
22,910 |
04-14-2013, 05:46 PM |
