|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
|
epixoip Wrote: (10-12-2013, 06:35 AM)
--
probably could have picked a better example license than the GPL. and good luck holding SL3 sleazebags accountable for copyright infringement. hashcat already... |
|
txczwgffr |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,450 |
10-13-2013, 06:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
|
atom Wrote: (10-12-2013, 09:15 PM)
--
However, i liked two arguments here. The one was that hashcat does not need to be open source. That's right.
--
The practical reason I brought up the closed-so... |
|
txczwgffr |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,450 |
10-13-2013, 06:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
|
Kuci Wrote: (10-11-2013, 11:06 PM)
--
atom, epixoip, radix...they all know how the project collaboration and management work. That's why I don't understand why hashcat is closed-source. They probably... |
|
txczwgffr |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,450 |
10-12-2013, 01:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
|
epixoip Wrote: (10-11-2013, 07:31 PM)
--
absolutely not.
--
It is hard for me to see how Hashcat would not be better if more people could contribute. If someone submits a patch that does something ... |
|
txczwgffr |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,450 |
10-11-2013, 08:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
| Of course the developers are free to license it as they choose. My question is why is hashcat closed source. Since there is no paid version, what is to lose? Do you not think hashcat would be bette... |
|
txczwgffr |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,450 |
10-11-2013, 05:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: Why closed source?
| Why is oclHashcat* closed source? As far as I can tell there is no paid version. It would be great if the source were freely available so more people could contribute code! |
|
txczwgffr |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,450 |
10-09-2013, 07:41 PM |
