Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.

Search Results
Post Author Forum Replies Views Posted [asc]
    Thread: Anyway to benchmark with specific parameters?
Post: RE: Anyway to benchmark with specific parameters?

atom Wrote: (03-10-2017, 11:52 AM) -- It's not hashcats fault, because the memory allocatable is limited by the OpenCL runtime. We've reported this to nvidia, here's a writeup: https://devtalk.nvidia...
133794m3r hashcat 9 10,644 03-10-2017, 05:10 PM
    Thread: Anyway to benchmark with specific parameters?
Post: RE: Anyway to benchmark with specific parameters?

rico Wrote: (03-09-2017, 07:03 PM) -- Ah yes, -m 8900. Not all hashes identify themselves so conveniently you must appreciate. Specifying the hash mode is required (unless MD5, the default, -m 0). --...
133794m3r hashcat 9 10,644 03-09-2017, 07:58 PM
    Thread: Anyway to benchmark with specific parameters?
Post: RE: Anyway to benchmark with specific parameters?

because the site _doesn't_ explain how it wants the hashes for the various formats I tried doing N:r:p:hash but that isn't working. and even dongi the following in a file gives me the same error. Has...
133794m3r hashcat 9 10,644 03-09-2017, 06:41 PM
    Thread: Anyway to benchmark with specific parameters?
Post: RE: Anyway to benchmark with specific parameters?

rico Wrote: (03-09-2017, 06:11 PM) -- Eh? Benchmark scores are measured in hashes per second, not time to exhaust keyspace... Just start cracking your hash and the "Speed.Dev.#1...: 10275.6 kH/s (0.0...
133794m3r hashcat 9 10,644 03-09-2017, 06:20 PM
  Information Thread: Anyway to benchmark with specific parameters?
Post: Anyway to benchmark with specific parameters?

I know that benchmark let's you select the algorithm but I was wondering if there was any way to do it with different parameters because the default benchmark mode for scrypt is (as far as I know) 2^1...
133794m3r hashcat 9 10,644 03-09-2017, 05:55 PM