|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: output file
Post: RE: output file
| Run oclHashcat-plus with --help to see the supported output formats.
I do something like:
Code:
--
$ cut -d':' -f1 cracked.txt | xargs -I {} -xn1 grep {} hashfile.txt
--
You could write a shell s... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
18,241 |
01-30-2012, 08:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: output file
Post: RE: output file
| cracked.txt is the file you output cracked hashes to (hash:plain).
hashfile.txt is the file you're reading hashes from (username:hash)
Use oclHashcat-plus with -o cracked.txt
Once it's finished, use... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
18,241 |
01-30-2012, 09:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: output file
Post: RE: output file
| Nice work. Perhaps you would like to post that in the User Contribution section too in case other people find it useful. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
18,241 |
01-31-2012, 07:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: what's ntlm hash format
Post: RE: what's ntlm hash format
| If you have username:hash you need to use the --username flag. Keep in mind the file will be converted to only hash if you use the --remove flag too, so keep a backup copy of the full dump. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
13,298 |
02-01-2012, 07:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: what's ntlm hash format
Post: RE: what's ntlm hash format
| You should be able to use the --show and --username flags to oclHashcat-plus with the original file in username:hash format. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
13,298 |
02-02-2012, 02:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: newbie of oclHashcat-plus 0.07 need brute-force help
Post: RE: newbie of oclHashcat-plus 0.07 need brute-forc...
| You don't think any passwords will have '0' in them?
https://hashcat.net/wiki/mask_attack |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
22,640 |
02-02-2012, 02:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: -m 11 can't decode 4 symbols passwords
Post: RE: -m 11 can't decode 4 symbols passwords
| Hmm, oclHashcat-lite cracked it, but -plus doesn't crack it with either dictionary or mask. Interesting. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,946 |
02-03-2012, 07:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: bug mask
Post: RE: bug mask
| I can duplicate the condition in 0.07, but it works correctly in 0.08-beta.
From the 0.08-beta docs/changes.txt:
Code:
--
type: bug
file: kernels
desc: fixed bug in NTLM and DCC brute-force AMD ker... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,098 |
02-07-2012, 11:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Maskprocessor with cudaHashcat-plus on windows
Post: RE: Maskprocessor with cudaHashcat-plus on windows
| Any special reason you'd use maskprocessor for that instead of -a 3? |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
13,895 |
02-15-2012, 03:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite v0.8 Bug Report Thread
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite v0.8 Bug Report Thread
| @lindros, atom is the creator of the tool, that's why atom has a beta version.
oclHashcat-plus 0.07 changed the identifying number for vBulletin hash types. It's a cosmetic change. The beta of oclHas... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
13 |
26,912 |
01-30-2012, 08:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite v0.8 Bug Report Thread
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite v0.8 Bug Report Thread
| I was pasting this over ssh and it seems like something got interpreted as control characters, because my terminal got messed up (cursor at the wrong location, typed characters appeared incorrect).
... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
13 |
26,912 |
01-31-2012, 12:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite v0.8 Bug Report Thread
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite v0.8 Bug Report Thread
| Hello lindros,
We were both making the same error. There are some hidden control characters in your hex salt. That's causing extra characters to be in the salt. I can verify that there does seem to b... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
13 |
26,912 |
01-31-2012, 12:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite v0.8 Bug Report Thread
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite v0.8 Bug Report Thread
| How are you opening a shell in Windows? There appears to be special hidden characters around the '&' in input & output you cut & pasted. Perhaps there is some strange shell expansion?
The --hex-salt ... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
13 |
26,912 |
01-31-2012, 06:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
| The same mask is applied to both sides (and since LM can hash at most 14 characters, that makes the longest mask 7).
1=8
2=9
...
6=13
7=14 |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,287 |
02-07-2012, 09:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| Excellent! I'll attempt to try this before you wake up. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,287 |
02-09-2012, 08:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug with Plain.Length.: display?
Post: Bug with Plain.Length.: display?
| I set pw-max to 8 and the Plain.Text. seems to be 8, but the display for Plain.Length. says 16.
$ ./oclhl64 -m 2400 -n 800 -d 2 --gpu-loops 1024 --pw-max 8 HASH
oclHashcat-lite v0.10 by atom start... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
2 |
6,165 |
07-16-2012, 06:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug with Plain.Length.: display?
Post: RE: Bug with Plain.Length.: display?
| Ahh, I was wondering if it was padded. I should have looked that up.
On the same hash I was running -plus-0.09b and I kept getting weird characters after the hash in the status display, but I guess t... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
2 |
6,165 |
07-17-2012, 06:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.09
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09
| A quick note on LM: When you do a mask attack the same mask applies to both halves of the hash, so using masks longer than 7 characters is pointless (and will not do what you expect). |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Announcements
|
16 |
56,854 |
02-04-2012, 12:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [split] [split] oclHashcat v0.26 - not cracking ntlm hashes
Post: RE: [split] [split] oclHashcat v0.26 - not crackin...
| I suspect I'm having this issue as well. I knew there was something strange with trying to crack NTLM, but I couldn't isolate the variables. I'll try the 32bit version and see if that makes a differen... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
25,590 |
10-20-2011, 08:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Cant make it work
Post: RE: Cant make it work
| -1 00010203...09 means that you can substitute ?1 into the mask and it will try the characters 00 through 09 in that space.
If you did something like
-1 abc
-2 xyz
-3 123
Then set the mask to ?1?2?3... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
20,121 |
10-23-2011, 10:13 PM |
