Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Can't recover certain plain w/dict or rules, only BF
Post: RE: Can't recover certain plain w/dict or rules, o...
I think it was the rules. 'c' wasn't behaving like I expected when placed at the end of a rule. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,178 |
10-23-2011, 06:40 AM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Llano A8 3850
Post: RE: AMD Llano A8 3850
I've used it with -plus, not with WPA because I don't have any .PCAPs to use.
It doesn't need to be crossfired to work, just go into the BIOS settings and force the APU to be "always on." Then (on Li... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
20,104 |
11-26-2011, 06:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: Can't recover certain plain w/dict or rules, only BF
Post: Can't recover certain plain w/dict or rules, only ...
I have a very odd situation where I've been able to crack a certain NTLM hash with brute-force (-lite) because I got the 8th & 9th chars from the LM hash using john.
I've been trying for 2 days to ... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,178 |
10-22-2011, 09:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Llano A8 3850
Post: RE: AMD Llano A8 3850
I modified the oclExample.sh script to take arguments passed on the command line. Here is the performance with -n 800
chort@hydra:~/code/oclHashcat-lite-0.06$ ./oclExample.sh -n 800 -d 1
oclHashcat-l... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
20,104 |
11-24-2011, 09:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Llano A8 3850
Post: RE: AMD Llano A8 3850
Yes I've tried with both GPUs currently (the default), but it slows down the 5870 too much. The 6550D runs full speed the entire time, but the 5870 stalls, goes to full speed, stalls, over and over. T... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
20,104 |
11-29-2011, 08:33 AM |
|
|
Thread: AMD Llano A8 3850
Post: RE: AMD Llano A8 3850
Unbuntu 11.04/64bit.
I did notice that running the 6550D at all really lags the UI response time now in Xwindows. I can't remember for sure if it did that with Cat 11.4/SDK 2.4, but I don't think so.... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
20,104 |
11-30-2011, 08:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: vm?
Post: RE: vm?
I don't believe the VM guest will be able to access the GPU functions necessary.
Why would you run it in a VM any way? There are both Windows and Linux versions. Are you on a Mac? |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
8,159 |
12-07-2011, 07:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: Why is crossfire slower than a single card?
Post: RE: Why is crossfire slower than a single card?
Specifically, make sure your xorg.conf has a device, screen, and monitor defined for each GPU. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
26,034 |
12-07-2011, 08:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: Freezes and lags on 0.07 version
Post: RE: Freezes and lags on 0.07 version
What sort of GPU are you using, out of curiosity? What model, what kind of system is it in? |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
43,356 |
01-01-2012, 11:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: Freezes and lags on 0.07 version
Post: RE: Freezes and lags on 0.07 version
So it's a PCIe card, not built-in? Hmm. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
43,356 |
01-01-2012, 11:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
Try increasing the -n value. It makes a big difference in some cases. Also for some hash types I've found that increasing --gpu-loops helps. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,714 |
01-02-2012, 05:15 AM |
|
|
Thread: What about --increment for bruteforcing ?
Post: RE: What about --increment for bruteforcing ?
Wrap it in a shell script with a for loop? |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,717 |
01-03-2012, 10:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: Worst documentation and usability EVER
Post: RE: Worst documentation and usability EVER
Brute-force is possible with a mask attack. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,183 |
01-13-2012, 02:25 AM |
|
|
Thread: Worst documentation and usability EVER
Post: RE: Worst documentation and usability EVER
BTW I changed the page on -plus to indicate brute-force is accomplished via mask attack (removed the link to brute-force attack page). |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,183 |
01-13-2012, 08:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: Just want to confirm it doesn't support
Post: RE: Just want to confirm it doesn't support
I added to the wiki under "Supported algorithms and GPU defaults," but not to the wiki copy of --help output, since it isn't actually in the help output at this time. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
13,637 |
01-20-2012, 07:21 AM |
|
|
Thread: reading directories with dictionaries in combinator mode
Post: RE: reading directories with dictionaries in combi...
You could also write your script to catch signals and send the process the signal you're trapping.
https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=bash+trap+signals |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,423 |
01-20-2012, 10:50 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus32 backtrack clGetDeviceIDs() -1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus32 backtrack clGetDeviceIDs() -...
Backtrack is irritating. The only reliable way I've found to run OpenCL apps in Backtrack is to open an X session and run the OpenCL app from an Xterm window. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
7,346 |
01-25-2012, 12:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: Problem with bruteforcing with GPU
Post: RE: Problem with bruteforcing with GPU
Documentation: https://hashcat.net/wiki/mask_attack |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,601 |
01-28-2012, 01:40 AM |
|
|
Thread: Ubuntu 10.10(64 bit)
Post: RE: Ubuntu 10.10(64 bit)
Use the cuda version with NVIDIA cards. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
19,477 |
01-28-2012, 09:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: Ubuntu 10.10(64 bit)
Post: RE: Ubuntu 10.10(64 bit)
If your video card is not supported, then your only option is Hashcat (not ocl/cuda). |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
19,477 |
01-28-2012, 08:08 PM |