|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat Benchmarking
Post: RE: Hashcat Benchmarking
| Looks like the Windows version of lite_bench is set to use -plus instead of -lite.
Add for -lite-0.09:
Code:
--
$BIN $OPTS -m 3000 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 --pw-min 7
--
|
|
chort |
User Contributions
|
8 |
19,304 |
02-04-2012, 04:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
| Here's how I'd like LM to work:
- Accepts 16char or 32char hash
- Outputs the plain for each independently, even in outfile (i.e. the hash length in outfile is 16char)
- Can reassemble whole plain wi... |
|
chort |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,601 |
02-05-2012, 01:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite v0.9 not want work on 5870 bug ?
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite v0.9 not want work on 5870 bug...
| For those who are getting clBuildProgram errors, did you reboot after applying 12.1? I have an Ubuntu box at home running 12.1 & oclHashcat-lite-0.09 just fine. My box at work is running 11.x and gets... |
|
chort |
Hardware
|
15 |
30,457 |
02-05-2012, 01:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hash question
Post: RE: Hash question
| I'm not an expert, but all the hashes beginning with "ok" appear to be descrypt with a fixed salt ('ok' is the salt in each case). The $1 format is extremely common. You can figure out what it is in a... |
|
chort |
General Help
|
2 |
6,181 |
02-05-2012, 02:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite v0.9 not want work on 5870 bug ?
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite v0.9 not want work on 5870 bug...
| That's odd. Try -d 1,2,3 (I think that's the format). |
|
chort |
Hardware
|
15 |
30,457 |
02-05-2012, 02:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
| oclHashcat-lite-0.09 already supports LM. The next release to support LM will likely be oclHashcat-plus-0.08. |
|
chort |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,601 |
02-05-2012, 06:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat running on the new AMD hd7970
Post: RE: oclHashcat running on the new AMD hd7970
| @med: are you talking about not losing cracked hashes? You can use the -o option to save cracks. Look at --help output. |
|
chort |
Hardware
|
52 |
175,232 |
02-05-2012, 09:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
| What card do you have? As I understand it, you must have 11.12 w/hotfix if you're using a 7970, but that doesn't install the AMD SDK that ships with 12.1 (which oclHashcat-lite-0.09 requires).
I've h... |
|
chort |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,601 |
02-06-2012, 05:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Post: RE: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
| What do you mean by "multiple dictionaries?" oclHashcat-plus can use multiple dictionaries if you give it a directory as the dictionary parameter. It can also use two dictionaries in combination by sp... |
|
chort |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
130,512 |
02-06-2012, 05:40 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Post: RE: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
| oclHashcat-plus can do this, but not with rules (currently).
https://hashcat.net/wiki/combinator_attack |
|
chort |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
130,512 |
02-07-2012, 05:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
| The same mask is applied to both sides (and since LM can hash at most 14 characters, that makes the longest mask 7).
1=8
2=9
...
6=13
7=14 |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,287 |
02-07-2012, 09:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
|
fatalx Wrote: (02-07-2012, 01:52 AM)
--
So I've got...
oclHashcat-lite64.exe -m 3000 --pw-min=8 --pw-max=8 --custom-charset1=?u?d?s?F 1D735ED099DEC228B79AE2610DD89D4C ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1Y
But it just ... |
|
chort |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,601 |
02-07-2012, 10:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: bug mask
Post: RE: bug mask
| I can duplicate the condition in 0.07, but it works correctly in 0.08-beta.
From the 0.08-beta docs/changes.txt:
Code:
--
type: bug
file: kernels
desc: fixed bug in NTLM and DCC brute-force AMD ker... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,098 |
02-07-2012, 11:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
|
chort |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,601 |
02-08-2012, 02:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Four Server And One Hash
Post: RE: Four Server And One Hash
| If you have NVIDIA card you want to use the cuda version of the command (not the ocl version). |
|
chort |
General Help
|
8 |
14,944 |
02-08-2012, 08:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Four Server And One Hash
Post: RE: Four Server And One Hash
| Make sure you read this for recommended versions:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/oclhashcat_catalyst_forceware |
|
chort |
General Help
|
8 |
14,944 |
02-08-2012, 10:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| Excellent! I'll attempt to try this before you wake up. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,287 |
02-09-2012, 08:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SHA512 Info
Post: RE: SHA512 Info
| So it's just straight SHA512 with no salt? I don't think you realize how bad that is. If an attacker steals your entire database, they can attack all the passwords simultaneously because they aren't s... |
|
chort |
Hardware
|
6 |
13,912 |
02-15-2012, 12:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Maskprocessor with cudaHashcat-plus on windows
Post: RE: Maskprocessor with cudaHashcat-plus on windows
| Any special reason you'd use maskprocessor for that instead of -a 3? |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
13,895 |
02-15-2012, 03:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Post: RE: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
| gat3way_ that is pretty cool. Will it be available in a tool any time soon? There is certainly demand (I get private requests related to malware analysis). |
|
chort |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
130,512 |
02-17-2012, 03:01 AM |
