Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Ubuntu 10.10(64 bit)
Post: RE: Ubuntu 10.10(64 bit)
Use the cuda version with NVIDIA cards. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
19,477 |
01-28-2012, 09:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: Ubuntu 10.10(64 bit)
Post: RE: Ubuntu 10.10(64 bit)
If your video card is not supported, then your only option is Hashcat (not ocl/cuda). |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
19,477 |
01-28-2012, 08:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat Benchmarking
Post: RE: Hashcat Benchmarking
Looks like the Windows version of lite_bench is set to use -plus instead of -lite.
Add for -lite-0.09:
Code:
--
$BIN $OPTS -m 3000 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 --pw-min 7
--
|
|
chort |
User Contributions
|
8 |
19,302 |
02-04-2012, 04:21 AM |
|
|
Thread: output file
Post: RE: output file
Run oclHashcat-plus with --help to see the supported output formats.
I do something like:
Code:
--
$ cut -d':' -f1 cracked.txt | xargs -I {} -xn1 grep {} hashfile.txt
--
You could write a shell s... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
18,236 |
01-30-2012, 08:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: output file
Post: RE: output file
cracked.txt is the file you output cracked hashes to (hash:plain).
hashfile.txt is the file you're reading hashes from (username:hash)
Use oclHashcat-plus with -o cracked.txt
Once it's finished, use... |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
18,236 |
01-30-2012, 09:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: output file
Post: RE: output file
Nice work. Perhaps you would like to post that in the User Contribution section too in case other people find it useful. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
18,236 |
01-31-2012, 07:31 AM |
|
|
Thread: Partially known password + md5 hash + trouble cracking
Post: RE: Partially known password + md5 hash + trouble ...
I found https://ob-security.info/ very helpful. |
|
chort |
General Help
|
5 |
17,242 |
01-31-2012, 01:57 AM |
|
|
Thread: Can't get it to crack known hashes
Post: RE: Can't get it to crack known hashes
Really? How did you generate the hashes?
chort@hydra:~$ echo -n '12345' | sha1sum
8cb2237d0679ca88db6464eac60da96345513964 -
chort@hydra:~$ echo -n '123456' | sha1sum
7c4a8d09ca3762af61e59520943dc... |
|
chort |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
17,212 |
01-19-2012, 05:21 AM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat Development Report I
Post: RE: Latest news from hashcat development
I'm really interested to see what the morph dictionary utility does.
All the development for oclhashcat-* sounds great. I hope hashcat does get some attention too though, because more Linux systems a... |
|
chort |
Organisation and Events
|
6 |
16,675 |
01-06-2012, 06:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: Four Server And One Hash
Post: RE: Four Server And One Hash
If you have NVIDIA card you want to use the cuda version of the command (not the ocl version). |
|
chort |
General Help
|
8 |
14,940 |
02-08-2012, 08:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: Four Server And One Hash
Post: RE: Four Server And One Hash
Make sure you read this for recommended versions:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/oclhashcat_catalyst_forceware |
|
chort |
General Help
|
8 |
14,940 |
02-08-2012, 10:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: SHA512 Info
Post: RE: SHA512 Info
So it's just straight SHA512 with no salt? I don't think you realize how bad that is. If an attacker steals your entire database, they can attack all the passwords simultaneously because they aren't s... |
|
chort |
Hardware
|
6 |
13,910 |
02-15-2012, 12:39 AM |
|
|
Thread: Maskprocessor with cudaHashcat-plus on windows
Post: RE: Maskprocessor with cudaHashcat-plus on windows
Any special reason you'd use maskprocessor for that instead of -a 3? |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
13,895 |
02-15-2012, 03:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: Just want to confirm it doesn't support
Post: RE: Just want to confirm it doesn't support
I added to the wiki under "Supported algorithms and GPU defaults," but not to the wiki copy of --help output, since it isn't actually in the help output at this time. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
13,637 |
01-20-2012, 07:21 AM |
|
|
Thread: Lost
Post: RE: Lost
Heh, it seems like there are new vulnerabilities in e107 reported every month. I'm not surprised those hashes show up all over the place. |
|
chort |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
13,621 |
01-06-2012, 05:40 PM |
|
|
Thread: Add rule name to status
Post: Add rule name to status
Please add the rule file (or table?) name above/below the Input.Mode status line.
Thanks! |
|
chort |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
13,535 |
12-27-2011, 11:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: what's ntlm hash format
Post: RE: what's ntlm hash format
If you have username:hash you need to use the --username flag. Keep in mind the file will be converted to only hash if you use the --remove flag too, so keep a backup copy of the full dump. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
13,291 |
02-01-2012, 07:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: what's ntlm hash format
Post: RE: what's ntlm hash format
You should be able to use the --show and --username flags to oclHashcat-plus with the original file in username:hash format. |
|
chort |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
13,291 |
02-02-2012, 02:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: Drupal 7 hashes
Post: RE: Drupal 7 hashes
It looks like 15 rounds of SHA512, prefixed with '$S$'. |
|
chort |
General Help
|
4 |
13,291 |
07-17-2012, 06:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: Don't work Sha-1(base-64)
Post: RE: Don't work Sha-1(base-64)
I believe that's correct. Try writing that into a file, then give hashcat the path to the file to read instead of passing the hash on the command line. |
|
chort |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
12,360 |
01-19-2012, 12:59 AM |