|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Why 290x showes 3G memory?
Post: Why 290x showes 3G memory?
|
Quote:
--
oclHashcat v1.20 starting...
Device #1: Hawaii, 3072MB, 1000Mhz, 44MCU
Device #2: Hawaii, 3072MB, 1000Mhz, 44MCU
--
Isn't it 4G memory? |
|
smile |
Hardware
|
2 |
6,648 |
05-09-2014, 08:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 290 vs 7970?
Post: 290 vs 7970?
| What's the performance different between 290 and 7970? Price of 290 is 30% more than 7970. |
|
smile |
Hardware
|
3 |
8,170 |
05-10-2014, 05:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 290 vs 7970?
Post: RE: 290 vs 7970?
|
epixoip Wrote: (05-10-2014, 10:42 AM)
--
25% increase in performance over 7970
--
Thanks，so 290 is good. |
|
smile |
Hardware
|
3 |
8,170 |
05-11-2014, 05:33 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v1.31 and v1.30 are both much slower than v1.21
Post: v1.31 and v1.30 are both much slower than v1.21
| My os is windows server 2008 r2， driver is 14.9，gpu are 290 or 290x , I found that v1.31 and v1.30 are both much slower than v1.21. The same happens on driver 14.4.
Command:
oclHashcat64... |
|
smile |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
17,410 |
10-16-2014, 02:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v1.31 and v1.30 are both much slower than v1.21
Post: RE: v1.31 and v1.30 are both much slower than v1.2...
|
atom Wrote: (10-16-2014, 10:55 AM)
--
Especially when it comes to raw MD5 you can be sure that we have a close eye on it's performance. Note that the default workload settings have been changed. If y... |
|
smile |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
17,410 |
10-16-2014, 01:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v1.31 and v1.30 are both much slower than v1.21
Post: RE: v1.31 and v1.30 are both much slower than v1.2...
|
philsmd Wrote: (10-16-2014, 03:00 PM)
--
1. there were a lot of changes and atom already mentioned that the default tuning was changed heavily among those versions. Also to avoid users continously re... |
|
smile |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
17,410 |
10-16-2014, 04:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v1.33 is much slower than v1.21,Can anyone test it
Post: RE: v1.33 is much slower than v1.21,Can anyone tes...
|
undeath Wrote: (03-06-2015, 03:52 PM)
--
did you read this thread? https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-4161.html
--
Yes, did you test my example? |
|
smile |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
7,879 |
03-06-2015, 04:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Writing hashfile.new takes too long time.
Post: Writing hashfile.new takes too long time.
| Writing large files takes too long time when exit the program, especially through the LAN, please use setvbuf to set the cache before writing files. |
|
smile |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,424 |
09-14-2015, 10:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Writing hashfile.new takes too long time.
Post: RE: Writing hashfile.new takes too long time.
|
smile |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,424 |
11-10-2015, 04:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v1.31 and v1.30 are both much slower than v1.21
Post: RE: v1.31 and v1.30 are both much slower than v1.2...
| No,the gpu clock did not drop on v1.31. I checked with msi afterburner and gpuz. Thanks.
chnhnm Wrote: (11-09-2014, 02:13 PM)
--
can you check if your gpu clock drop when your display goes off. c... |
|
smile |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
17,410 |
11-10-2014, 02:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v1.33 is much slower than v1.21,Can anyone test it
Post: v1.33 is much slower than v1.21,Can anyone test it
| With my hashlist :
Speed of v1.31/1.32/1.33 :2400 MH/s
Speed of v1.21 :7000 Mh/s
I said it on my last post, but nobody believe me.
So I send the example hashlist and command to... |
|
smile |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
7,879 |
03-06-2015, 03:31 PM |
