|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: SL3, they did it again
Post: RE: SL3, they did it again
| Moneyworshipper sons of whores...
It's like they would kill each other for this sl3 dogshit... |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
71 |
191,545 |
01-01-2013, 06:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.42: Bugs
Post: 0.42: Bugs
| In this thread I'm going to share bugs that still exist in the current latest release of CPU's hashcat (0.42), their severity level and personal workaround if available. Feel free to join me pissing a... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
11,648 |
01-01-2013, 04:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2013 outdated versions
Post: RE: 2013 outdated versions
| You now force me to use my psychic abilities and rephrase what the dude meant when he made his post.
Obviously the post is about CPU's hashcat, 0.42b5 preciously. His reference of -plus's beta was ... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
6,484 |
01-01-2013, 03:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v0.42
Post: RE: hashcat v0.42
| Another step forward, keep up the good work! |
|
M@LIK |
Old hashcat Announcements
|
3 |
17,433 |
01-01-2013, 03:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.42b5: The rule Q
Post: RE: 0.42b5: The rule Q
| Fixed with hashcat-0.42. Thank you! |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,296 |
01-01-2013, 03:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2013 outdated versions
Post: RE: 2013 outdated versions
| The dude made his post before the release, so stop being smart-ass(s). |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
6,484 |
01-01-2013, 03:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.11
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.1...
| Great job atom (https://hashcat.net/forum/user-1.html), as always, lovely updates.
Happy new version everyone! |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
36 |
85,152 |
12-31-2012, 05:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.42b5: The rule Q
Post: 0.42b5: The rule Q
| The new rule Q seems to do exactly the opposite of what it really suppose to do.
D contains "pussy".
R1 contains "M u Q".
R2 contains "M l Q".
"hc64 -r R1 D --stdout" prints nothing.
While "h... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,296 |
12-31-2012, 01:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat Bruteforce attack
Post: RE: Hashcat Bruteforce attack
| The following thread will help you:
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1836.html |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
48,689 |
12-30-2012, 02:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Exhausted?
Post: RE: Exhausted?
|
Toil Wrote:
--
am i doing it wrong
--
Yes, you're doing it wrong.
1st, your commands are ugly, stack them properly.
2nd, your use of the -c parameter with a brute-force attack is extremely ignora... |
|
M@LIK |
General Help
|
6 |
40,297 |
12-24-2012, 04:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How to configure mask attack
Post: RE: How to configure mask attack
| hccap files can only contain one handshake. It's impossible to crack more than one handshake using -plus, unless you run more than one instance (with different hccap files).
I don't know how to tell ... |
|
M@LIK |
General Help
|
5 |
16,691 |
12-21-2012, 01:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: maskprocessor increment with 2 digits applied
Post: RE: maskprocessor increment with 2 digits applied
| I don't about WPA, but for simple hashing algorithms, see: https://www.md5decrypter.co.uk/hash-a-password.aspx |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
22,049 |
12-20-2012, 11:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: maskprocessor increment with 2 digits applied
Post: RE: maskprocessor increment with 2 digits applied
|
Code:
--
-plus hccap ?l?d?d
-plus hccap ?l?l?d?d
-plus hccap ?l?l?l?d?d
-plus hccap ?l?l?l?l?d?d
-plus hccap ?l?l?l?l?l?d?d
...
--
Run one at a time.
Another option is to make a loop:
Code:... |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
22,049 |
12-20-2012, 11:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: maskprocessor increment with 2 digits applied
Post: RE: maskprocessor increment with 2 digits applied
| -plus reads s or p from STDIN (user's input), and since STDIN is busy with mp64 there's no way to read user's input, so the status show every 10 secs automatically.
Again, the neatest, best way to ... |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
22,049 |
12-20-2012, 10:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-gui problem
Post: RE: oclHashcat-gui problem
| Smart enough to take a screen shot and draw some retarded arrows and numbers but not to type a bloody YES.
... Dexter is only good at killing. |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
13,588 |
12-19-2012, 02:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: mode -a 5 Not working
Post: RE: mode -a 5 Not working
| It wasn't officially, properly documented or explained but:
Tables used in Table Look-up attacks has a slightly changed format since -0.41, see below:
CHAR=STR
Where CHAR is a single character, and... |
|
M@LIK |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
7,378 |
12-17-2012, 10:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite-0.11-rc3 seperator bug
Post: RE: Results: oclHashcat-lite-0.11-rc3-12.8
| Interesting.
Reproduced and confirmed.
EDiT: It simply exits with code -1. |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
3 |
4,384 |
12-15-2012, 01:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: maskprocessor increment with 2 digits applied
Post: RE: maskprocessor increment with 2 digits applied
| To fully utilize GPU, use separate lines.
Or at least, pipe the a-z part only and use rules on -plus's side.
Code:
--
mp64 --increment-min=6 ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l | -plus -r ./hybrid/append_d.rule -r ... |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
22,049 |
12-14-2012, 11:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Results: oclHashcat-lite-0.11-rc3-12.8
Post: RE: Results: oclHashcat-lite-0.11-rc3-12.8
| Why MD5 benchmarks are appearing twice? Once in the beginning and again in the end... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,852 |
12-13-2012, 12:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: time estimate for brute forcing wpa2
Post: RE: time estimate for brute forcing wpa2
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
12,292 |
12-12-2012, 09:06 PM |
