|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: 0.42b5: The rule Q
Post: RE: 0.42b5: The rule Q
| Fixed with hashcat-0.42. Thank you! |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,299 |
01-01-2013, 03:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2013 outdated versions
Post: RE: 2013 outdated versions
| You now force me to use my psychic abilities and rephrase what the dude meant when he made his post.
Obviously the post is about CPU's hashcat, 0.42b5 preciously. His reference of -plus's beta was ... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
6,486 |
01-01-2013, 03:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.42: Bugs
Post: RE: 0.42: Bugs
| Well, let's just consider the "keep things a little private" part.
I assume you're talking about the --hex-salt bug.
Details:
Code:
--
H:
38b3eff8baf56627478ec76a704e9b52:3130
// "101" md5ed
... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
11,655 |
01-01-2013, 06:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.42: Bugs
Post: RE: 0.42: Bugs
| Level: Non-critical.
hashcat adds something completely different than the actual hash to hashcat.pot.
Further details: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1789.html
Workaround: If you need them so bad... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
11,655 |
01-01-2013, 07:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.42: Bugs
Post: 0.42: Bugs
| In this thread I'm going to share bugs that still exist in the current latest release of CPU's hashcat (0.42), their severity level and personal workaround if available. Feel free to join me pissing a... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
11,655 |
01-01-2013, 04:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.42: Bugs
Post: RE: 0.42: Bugs
|
atom Wrote:
--
Hm, thought I fixed this. So its still in there?
--
Yes, sir.
Level: Non-critical.
hashcat doesn't remove the hash using --remove parameter if it was only one hash and it was crack... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
11,655 |
01-02-2013, 11:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.42: Bugs
Post: RE: 0.42: Bugs
|
radix Wrote:
--
k, hex charset is fixed
--
hashcat-0.43b1:
Okay, it's a "known option" now, but:
Code:
--
hc64 -a3 --hex-charset -1 30 hash ?1
...
NOTE: press enter for status-screen
cfcfcc... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
11,655 |
01-05-2013, 10:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3-12.8
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3-12.8
|
atom Wrote:
--
The lots-of-wordlists bug is fixed in b2
--
Confirmed. Thanks! |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,855 |
01-05-2013, 11:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite-0.11-rc3 seperator bug
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite-0.11-rc3 seperator bug
|
atom Wrote:
--
Thanks, fixed :)
--
Okay, it doesn't exit now, but it simply ignores the given char and insist on using ":"
Code:
--
hc64l -p" " 9033e0e305f247c0c3c80d0c7848c8b3 !
...
9033e0e305f2... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
3 |
4,387 |
01-06-2013, 01:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.42: Bugs
Post: RE: 0.42: Bugs
| hashcat-0.43b3:
Level: Critical
hashcat is crashing instantly when using -a3.
Code:
--
hash = 00000000000000000000000000000000
hc64 -a3 hash ?d?d?d?d
Initializing hashcat v0.43 by atom with 8 th... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
11,655 |
01-09-2013, 03:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bugs
Post: RE: Bugs
| 1- Are we suppose to share reports of beta bugs with the release bugs?
2- What if I don't know how to use this "Trac system"? |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,654 |
01-16-2013, 07:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bugs
Post: RE: Bugs
| Although I never liked this "Trac" thing, I see very hot hardcore action on that side.
Looks like I'm forced to join. |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,654 |
01-20-2013, 11:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.43 rc3
Post: RE: hashcat 0.43 rc3
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,238 |
03-06-2013, 01:46 PM |
