Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Cisco ASA
Post: RE: Cisco ASA
Then -a7 is the way to go!
It requires a mask on the left side and a dict on the right side, means, the brute-force mask on the left side and the chopped usernames on the right side. See below:
C... |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
45,270 |
10-19-2012, 05:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: Cisco ASA
Post: RE: Cisco ASA
Btw, I wrote this perl script to make the charactersets out of the usernames list, you don't need to chop them or anything, just do:
Code:
--
perl CiscoASA.pl < usernames
--
CiscoASA.pl:
Code:
-... |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
45,270 |
10-19-2012, 06:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: Error! Using 8 bit Number bruteforce crack !
Post: RE: Error! Using 8 bit Number bruteforce crack ...
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
23,941 |
03-05-2013, 03:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: Problem with brute-force
Post: RE: Problem with brute-force
Try coping the command line next to Start button and pasting it into the cmd window that popes up.
An advice: Try learning command-lines, GUI is definitely not for pros = ) |
|
M@LIK |
Old hashcat Support
|
14 |
28,919 |
07-09-2012, 06:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: Problem with brute-force
Post: RE: Problem with brute-force
*sighs*
Your card nVidia card doesn't support CUDA === NO oclhashcat-plus|lite for you, sorry ! |
|
M@LIK |
Old hashcat Support
|
14 |
28,919 |
07-09-2012, 08:35 PM |
|
|
Thread: brute-forcing not working with me
Post: RE: brute-forcing not working with me
Your syntax is right, your hashfile "New Text Document.txt" is fucked. |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
19,507 |
08-03-2012, 06:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: brute-forcing not working with me
Post: RE: brute-forcing not working with me
You still doing it wrong.
You have to write a mask after the hashfile!
Also, I don't know why you are re-setting default values.
Try:
Code:
--
cudaHashcat-plus32 -a3 -1 ?l?u test.txt ?1?1?1?1?1?1... |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
19,507 |
08-03-2012, 10:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: brute-forcing not working with me
Post: RE: brute-forcing not working with me
https://hashcat.net/wiki/mask_attack#examples |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
19,507 |
08-03-2012, 10:52 PM |
|
|
Thread: V59 is up
Post: RE: V59 is up
oclHashcat-plus-0.08
hc64p -n320 --gpu-loops=512 -a3 -1 ?l?u?d?s --runtime=120 1mfakemd5.hash ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
Speed........: 164.9M c/s Real, 164.8M c/s GPU
oclHashcat-plus-0.09b61
hc64p -n... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,551 |
09-01-2012, 02:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: 16 byte salt support for joomla
Post: RE: 16 byte salt support for joomla
wow.. never knew this was discussed here..
+1 for this =) |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
22,305 |
04-28-2012, 03:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: 16 byte salt support for joomla
Post: RE: 16 byte salt support for joomla
1- maybe he didn't upload it yet..
2- it would be better if the error was like this:
Code:
--
joomla.txt:1:hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh:ssssssssssssssss (Line-length exception)
joomla.txt:2:hh... |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
22,305 |
04-28-2012, 07:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: IPB2 md5(md5($salt).md5($pass)) issue?
Post: RE: IPB2 md5(md5($salt).md5($pass)) issue?
Are you sure?
Cause I generated the hash for "omgwtf" and here's what I found:
Code:
--
7f8f65c062e3a9536fad48fead0af65a:S$~./
--
7f8f65c062e3a9536fad48fead0af65a: S$~./:omgwtf
2811 = IPB2+, MyB... |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
30,291 |
05-16-2012, 12:27 AM |
|
|
Thread: IPB2 md5(md5($salt).md5($pass)) issue?
Post: RE: IPB2 md5(md5($salt).md5($pass)) issue?
Ahh, yes... you gave two different salts -__-
Anyway, the hashes you provide are correct cracks:
Code:
--
d59be66565eeb562bb2b724d71b8a4e3:S$~!!:omgwtf
f179e7768678b3c5daa920bbfc75cffd:Fu~!!:474... |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
30,291 |
05-16-2012, 12:55 AM |
|
|
Thread: IPB2 md5(md5($salt).md5($pass)) issue?
Post: RE: IPB2 md5(md5($salt).md5($pass)) issue?
Then, I'm sorry I don't know what's wrong there. |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
30,291 |
05-16-2012, 01:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: Removing Bad Hashes
Post: RE: Removing Bad Hashes
Well, it always differs from one situation to another.
There's no one holly command which will help you always xD |
|
M@LIK |
General Talk
|
13 |
28,532 |
07-08-2012, 07:36 PM |
|
|
Thread: Removing Bad Hashes
Post: RE: Removing Bad Hashes
@Hash-IT (https://hashcat.net/forum/user-776.html):: Replaying to your PM too:
What you want to do can be easily done using the following RegEx command:
Code:
--
^00000[^0]
--
This will remove any... |
|
M@LIK |
General Talk
|
13 |
28,532 |
07-08-2012, 04:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
Post: RE: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
Hashes with $1$ are different.
Use: -m500 or --hash-type 500. |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
25,440 |
09-20-2012, 06:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
I suppose you are on Windows. Try with -r nul since you aren't using any actual rules. |
|
M@LIK |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-22-2012, 10:58 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Okay, I can't really explain why it doesn't print the time when using AsIs.rule, but if I were you I'd just modify my script in a way that if there's no rulefile set > use 'nul' as a rulefile and carr... |
|
M@LIK |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-23-2012, 12:36 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
He did, in the first post. |
|
M@LIK |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,258 |
10-26-2012, 05:32 PM |