|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[asc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| Re-tested after increasing --gpu-loops.
Code:
--
1 Million MD5s:
0.08:.............165.4M
0.09b75:..........171.1M
0.09b75(len_9):...171.2M
RESULT: 0.09 wins!
25k MD5s:
0.08:.............2... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,867 |
09-04-2012, 03:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| Just a few notes before we dive into the hardcore stuff:
docs\user_manuals.txt(line_3) is old enough to be removed, or just tag it with "Outdated".
--help(line_35), you can add " --outfile-form... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-05-2012, 12:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Stop auto incrementing
Post: RE: Stop auto incrementing
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
20,477 |
09-05-2012, 11:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| Windows7 64-bit, nVidia, 304,79 beta, oclHashcat-plus-0.09-rc2.
About -m's:
-m3000(FAGGOT!): -a0 fails to crack len_6 passwords unless it's piped using echo -n and not a dict. -a1, -a7 appends a c... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-06-2012, 02:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| Last one to know! xD
"full 32 char hex" are the REAL PAiN!
A nice script will help you in joining and splitting your hashes. |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-06-2012, 09:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| Fantastic! Thanks to you!
atom Wrote:
--
That is because all input into oclHashcat-plus for mode -m 131 (and -m 3000 and -m 3100 as well) is converted into uppercase because these systems do not s... |
|
M@LIK |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-06-2012, 12:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite Bruteforce Question
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite Bruteforce Question
| For fixed length you need to set --pw-min|max, so yes, you last command is correct.
And no, you do not need to disable markov, it will not skip any combination in the given range. It will only change... |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
4 |
13,216 |
09-07-2012, 02:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite Bruteforce Question
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite Bruteforce Question
|
NeonFlash Wrote:
--
In the documentation it says, use --markov-disable for a bruteforce attack.
--
That need to be changed.
You only disable it when you need a real NEAT brute-force (aa, ab, ac).
... |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
4 |
13,216 |
09-07-2012, 02:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09
| Great work! Good job all! |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
21 |
94,670 |
09-07-2012, 04:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Can't find dics folder
Post: RE: Can't find dics folder
| Weird.
This used to work on 0.08:
Code:
--
hc64p 00000000000000000000000000000000 d\*.dic
--
But not anymore with 0.09, 0.09 is not even accepting a directory.
But you can workaround it, on Wind... |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,034 |
09-10-2012, 02:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: per dictionary rules, more dictionaries
Post: RE: per dictionary rules, more dictionaries
| Too much.
CPU can't handle all this. And even if it does, it would require one ugly code. |
|
M@LIK |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
14,368 |
09-17-2012, 06:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: per dictionary rules, more dictionaries
Post: RE: per dictionary rules, more dictionaries
| FYI, combination in CPU's hashcat accepts as many dicts as you like. It works separately on each dict in the line (Combining it to itself). |
|
M@LIK |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
14,368 |
09-17-2012, 07:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [BUGREPORT] 64-bit hashcat crashes when a rule file has exactly 2 rules
Post: RE: [BUGREPORT] 64-bit hashcat crashes when a rule...
|
M@LIK |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
4,834 |
09-16-2012, 02:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashcat-plus-0.09
Post: RE: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashca...
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
16 |
32,347 |
09-20-2012, 03:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
Post: RE: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
| Hashes with $1$ are different.
Use: -m500 or --hash-type 500. |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
25,440 |
09-20-2012, 06:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [LM] Append a '0' with rules file ?!
Post: RE: [LM] Append a '0' with rules file ?!
| Lots of LM bugs were fixed, but few are still (I can only remember one).
I thinking of perl script for splitting\joining. |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
17,468 |
09-20-2012, 09:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
| Confirming the ignoring of --increment-min when using -i.
We have to create masks like before:
Code:
--
?1
?1?1
?1?1?1
?1?1?1?1
--
|
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,569 |
09-21-2012, 12:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: cudaHashcat-plus64 on Debian fails when using a known password
Post: RE: cudaHashcat-plus64 on Debian fails when using ...
| Your password must be 8 min 15 max in length. |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
13,962 |
09-21-2012, 04:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Usage of --increment-min ?
Post: RE: Usage of --increment-min ?
| Unfortunately, there's a bug with --increment-min|max
M@LIK Wrote:
--
Confirming the ignoring of --increment-min when using -i.
We have to create masks like before:
Code:
--
?1
?1?1
?1?1?1
?1?... |
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
11,254 |
09-22-2012, 09:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Help Me HD 7970 Sow Error For Sl3 Crecking
Post: RE: Help Me HD 7970 Sow Error For Sl3 Crecking
|
M@LIK |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
2 |
7,382 |
09-22-2012, 01:19 PM |
