|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
philsmd Wrote: (02-10-2017, 10:51 AM)
--
@c4pOne you should definitely make sure you are using the latest version of hashcat-utils (v1.5 or higher), because as you can read/see here https://github.co... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,645 |
02-10-2017, 06:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| You know what'd be nice? If there were an option to output all handshakes in separate .hccapx files according to their SSID names. E.g. Kropotkin.hccapx (4 hs), Bakunin.hccapx (12 hs), Proudhon.hccapx... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,645 |
02-11-2017, 10:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Also, I have a test AP here whose password is known. cap2hccapx extracts dosens of handshakes from my .cap files off that AP. Yet the known password isn't being cracked. I'm assuming 100% of all of th... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,645 |
02-16-2017, 08:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| I get the part about the non-authenticated handshakes. I guess I'm missing something important about how the protocol works which I will have to research on my own, because the MACS indicate that thes... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,645 |
02-16-2017, 10:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
TheFool Wrote: (03-09-2017, 07:17 PM)
--
abdou99 Wrote: (03-09-2017, 07:10 PM)
--
TheFool Wrote: (03-09-2017, 06:50 PM)
--
c4p0ne Wrote: (02-16-2017, 08:28 PM)
--
Also, I have a test AP here whose... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,645 |
03-09-2017, 09:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| I didn't take any special action. Just reporting my results with the provided ap.cap/ap.hccapx, which are that the .cap contains at least 3 crackable handshakes. I don't know why your .hccapx file is ... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,645 |
03-10-2017, 02:24 AM |
| |
|
Thread: litecoin wallet
Post: RE: litecoin wallet
| I definitely wouldn't mind. I've got two old wallets that could use a good smashing. They've not got more than 100 bucks in aggregate so I'm in no real rush, although I would like to have my money bac... |
|
c4p0ne |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
9,240 |
02-16-2014, 01:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat-utils are being detected as trojans!
Post: RE: hashcat-utils are being detected as trojans!
| Whew, and I thought it may have been because of hashcats support for recovering passwords for wallet.dat files. https://hashcat.net/forum/images/icons/tongue.gif |
|
c4p0ne |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
9 |
21,322 |
11-26-2013, 01:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: blowfish brute
Post: RE: blowfish brute
| Make sure there's no trailing spaces in the hash if you're loading a list. |
|
c4p0ne |
hashcat
|
17 |
24,502 |
09-03-2016, 12:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MultiGPU Verify Usage on Windows
Post: RE: MultiGPU Verify Usage on Windows
|
atom Wrote: (02-15-2011, 02:08 PM)
--
didnt you see this message?
NOTE: When experiencing preformance loss due to mixed GPU types try using the -d option.
mixed gpu types are no longer supported. w... |
|
c4p0ne |
Hardware
|
3 |
12,380 |
02-15-2011, 03:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MultiGPU Verify Usage on Windows
Post: MultiGPU Verify Usage on Windows
| How can I VERIFY beyond a shadow of a doubt that BOTH GPU's are being utilized? You see,
Digests: 4062572 entries, 4062572 unique
Bitmaps: 21 bits, 1048576 entries, 0x000fffff mask, 4194304 bytes
P... |
|
c4p0ne |
Hardware
|
3 |
12,380 |
02-15-2011, 12:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Cracking Speed: R290X vs. R290
Post: Cracking Speed: R290X vs. R290
| I'm thinking about getting back in... Now, considering the significant differences in price (at least where I live) between the R290 and R290X models, and the fact that i'm looking into rocking betwee... |
|
c4p0ne |
Hardware
|
1 |
9,507 |
11-17-2013, 04:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New ASRock Motherboards
Post: RE: New ASRock Motherboards
| I suppose it could be used for some alt-coins that are still minable using GPU. I guess if there were ASIC PCI style cards that were compatible with this, one could just stuff it full of those and sti... |
|
c4p0ne |
Hardware
|
14 |
27,282 |
02-21-2014, 04:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Fury X has joined the game
Post: RE: Fury X has joined the game
| Unless they do something really dramatic, and very rapidly, AMD is finally dead. Nvidia killed it. |
|
c4p0ne |
General Talk
|
30 |
57,730 |
06-25-2015, 08:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New algorithm
Post: RE: New algorithm
| All of these look too good to select just one. I think it should've been a rating from most-to-least important. |
|
c4p0ne |
General Talk
|
2 |
4,572 |
05-18-2016, 11:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: md5(PHPbb3) Support.
Post: md5(PHPbb3) Support.
|
c4p0ne |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
8,567 |
05-11-2010, 03:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Which Feature / Algo to add next to oclHashcat?
Post: RE: Which Feature / Algo to add next to oclHashcat...
| All algos that are designed to deliberately waste CPU cycles in order to mitigate the possibility of a potential attack (such as PHPbb3@ over 8000 rounds), should be added first. |
|
c4p0ne |
Feature Requests
|
10 |
26,413 |
06-24-2010, 12:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
Post: RE: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
| Been busting some tough little shells lately on WPA/2. My personal reason for this being a good added feature is that it would free people from using "that other commercial solution" which has been to... |
|
c4p0ne |
Feature Requests
|
60 |
142,801 |
03-10-2011, 03:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
Post: RE: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
|
atom Wrote: (08-22-2011, 01:51 PM)
--
is there still interesst in WPA/WPA2?
--
Ha ha! As if anyone is going to say "no" to that question! Nice one! ;) |
|
c4p0ne |
Feature Requests
|
60 |
142,801 |
08-23-2011, 01:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
Post: RE: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
| Just wondering, why the special format? Why the patch to convert from pcap to hccap? Wouldn't it have been easier (forgive the ignorance on this one) to just have the gpu-hashcats deal directly with o... |
|
c4p0ne |
Feature Requests
|
60 |
142,801 |
08-31-2011, 12:28 PM |
