|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: New algorithm
Post: RE: New algorithm
| All of these look too good to select just one. I think it should've been a rating from most-to-least important. |
|
c4p0ne |
General Talk
|
2 |
4,572 |
05-18-2016, 11:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New ASRock Motherboards
Post: RE: New ASRock Motherboards
| I suppose it could be used for some alt-coins that are still minable using GPU. I guess if there were ASIC PCI style cards that were compatible with this, one could just stuff it full of those and sti... |
|
c4p0ne |
Hardware
|
14 |
27,269 |
02-21-2014, 04:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| When loading .cap files into recovery software like Elcomsoft's or Passcape's which were reported by those programs as "Invalid Handshakes", I always wondered why when converting those to hccap, and t... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-08-2017, 02:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| When converting from .pcap is the converter considering ALL available handshakes (including invalid), or only valid handshakes for output to .hccapx ? |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-08-2017, 06:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
rico Wrote: (02-08-2017, 06:45 PM)
--
Did atom not already answer that earlier in this thread?! https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-6273-post-33445.html#pid33445
--
Yeah, it was unclear the first time... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-08-2017, 07:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Incidentally, I think the latest version of Passcape's software (v4.x) has implemented the "many for price of one" feature into their commercial product... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-08-2017, 11:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| It would be nice to see cap2hccapx be able to handle very large (>1GB) .pcap files. I am getting the message "too many ESSID's" on occasion. |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-09-2017, 01:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Worked.... But for some reason (and this is with the pre-compiled binary, too, not just the one I built) I get 0 handshakes written with 100% of my captures. A good portion of those captures get prope... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-09-2017, 10:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
philsmd Wrote: (02-10-2017, 10:51 AM)
--
@c4pOne you should definitely make sure you are using the latest version of hashcat-utils (v1.5 or higher), because as you can read/see here https://github.co... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-10-2017, 06:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| You know what'd be nice? If there were an option to output all handshakes in separate .hccapx files according to their SSID names. E.g. Kropotkin.hccapx (4 hs), Bakunin.hccapx (12 hs), Proudhon.hccapx... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-11-2017, 10:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Also, I have a test AP here whose password is known. cap2hccapx extracts dosens of handshakes from my .cap files off that AP. Yet the known password isn't being cracked. I'm assuming 100% of all of th... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-16-2017, 08:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| I get the part about the non-authenticated handshakes. I guess I'm missing something important about how the protocol works which I will have to research on my own, because the MACS indicate that thes... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-16-2017, 10:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
TheFool Wrote: (03-09-2017, 07:17 PM)
--
abdou99 Wrote: (03-09-2017, 07:10 PM)
--
TheFool Wrote: (03-09-2017, 06:50 PM)
--
c4p0ne Wrote: (02-16-2017, 08:28 PM)
--
Also, I have a test AP here whose... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
03-09-2017, 09:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| I didn't take any special action. Just reporting my results with the provided ap.cap/ap.hccapx, which are that the .cap contains at least 3 crackable handshakes. I don't know why your .hccapx file is ... |
|
c4p0ne |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
03-10-2017, 02:24 AM |
| |
|
Thread: nVidia 263.06 (beta) drivers confirmed working
Post: RE: nVidia 263.06 (beta) drivers confirmed working
|
Rolf Wrote: (11-29-2010, 04:19 PM)
--
Yep, that's the driver that's been floating around.
It's generally needed to toy with 3.2 release toolkit/sdk.
'Course, I measured even more performance drop w... |
|
c4p0ne |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
9,321 |
11-30-2010, 01:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat 21 speed reduction
Post: RE: oclhashcat 21 speed reduction
| Welp, just upgraded to the latest bleeding edge nvidia drivers 257.21 (CUDA 3.1.1) and still get about 112m md5 per second. Abysmal compared to 900m+. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong, some new confi... |
|
c4p0ne |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
14,016 |
06-24-2010, 02:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat 21 speed reduction
Post: RE: oclhashcat 21 speed reduction
|
atom Wrote: (06-24-2010, 04:04 PM)
--
please paste speed of v0.18 with this command:
oclHashcat.exe example.hash -1 ?l?d ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1 -n 8
and of v0.21 with this command:
oclHashcat.exe... |
|
c4p0ne |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
14,016 |
06-28-2010, 08:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat 21 speed reduction
Post: RE: oclhashcat 21 speed reduction
|
Rolf Wrote: (06-28-2010, 09:48 AM)
--
Latest OCLHC is optimized to handle up to 0.5M hashes.
--
Hmm, it was becoming apparent that the latest version was optimized for lower numbers of hashes. Gues... |
|
c4p0ne |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
14,016 |
06-28-2010, 03:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat+ v0.03
Post: RE: oclHashcat+ v0.03
| Awesommmmmmmmmmmeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!! |
|
c4p0ne |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
2 |
13,388 |
02-02-2011, 03:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite leaked !!!
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite leaked !!!
| The guy who perpetrated this obviously idiotic act is clearly an ignorant half-witted hillbilly wannabe "entrepreneur". A grubby miniature-brained peon at BEST. The proof is in how the moron decided t... |
|
c4p0ne |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Announcements
|
21 |
57,930 |
03-31-2011, 03:30 PM |
