|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[desc]
|
| |
|
Thread: fglrx will not load: KCL_AtomicTestBit
Post: RE: fglrx will not load: KCL_AtomicTestBit
| of course the glaring null ptr deref there is a pretty big indication of a bug in the driver, but i can't say any of us have experienced that.
have you tried testing each gpu individually, or two at ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
4 |
8,564 |
04-13-2013, 12:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: fglrx will not load: KCL_AtomicTestBit
Post: RE: fglrx will not load: KCL_AtomicTestBit
| what kernel are you using, by the way? all of my systems are on 3.2.0-39-generic. it could be that a more recent backported patch was introduced that has broken compatibility with 13.1 |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
4 |
8,564 |
04-13-2013, 12:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Which HD 7970s are you using in Linux?
Post: RE: Which HD 7970s are you using in Linux?
| a 7970 is a 7970, regardless of OEM. they all use the same GPU provided by AMD. some come out of the manufacturing process better than others and thus can be pushed to higher clocks, but they're all t... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
5 |
11,153 |
04-13-2013, 12:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Which HD 7970s are you using in Linux?
Post: RE: Which HD 7970s are you using in Linux?
| you should be able to push the clocks on that card to 1100Mhz with no problems. you can even flash the other card's bios onto that card to get the proper voltage tweaks if necessary. but it shouldn't ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
5 |
11,153 |
04-13-2013, 12:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: fglrx will not load: KCL_AtomicTestBit
Post: RE: fglrx will not load: KCL_AtomicTestBit
| haha ok. we've had some growing pains with one of our FT72B7015's as well, and what we ended up doing was pulling it out of the rack and leaving it at the office for a few days until we could work out... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
4 |
8,564 |
04-13-2013, 01:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 5970 slow?
Post: RE: 5970 slow?
| first, you're comparing lite to plus. second, you're using a salted algorithm, not a raw algorithm. third, we have no idea how many hashes/unique salts you're cracking because you did not paste the fu... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
12 |
22,929 |
04-15-2013, 02:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 5970 slow?
Post: RE: 5970 slow?
| also, i don't know if you caught it, but in my benchmark output that you link to, you'll see that i'm running my 5970s at 830Mhz. so if you're running yours at 725Mhz, you need to take that into accou... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
12 |
22,929 |
04-15-2013, 02:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v0.14 working but unable to quit or exit the program
Post: RE: v0.14 working but unable to quit or exit the p...
| yep, 5xxx series was super prone to ASIC hangs with even mild overclocking. there's not much headroom on those cards. i don't go higher than 880 Mhz on my 5870s, and that's with overvolting. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,139 |
04-15-2013, 08:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 5970 slow?
Post: RE: 5970 slow?
| the salt makes a difference depending on the number of hashes, and also whether it's salt.pass or pass.salt. i have only posted benchmarks for lite, which only supports pass.salt. -m 120 is salt.pass,... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
12 |
22,929 |
04-15-2013, 05:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 5970 slow?
Post: RE: 5970 slow?
| for reference, here's the speeds i get with 2x 5970
Code:
--
Hash.Type......: MD5
Speed.GPU.#1...: 3665.4M/s
Speed.GPU.#2...: 3665.5M/s
Speed.GPU.#3...: 3665.4M/s
Speed.GPU.#4...: 3665.4M/s
Spe... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
12 |
22,929 |
04-15-2013, 05:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Help me with oclHashcat-plus. ERROR: No AMD/SDS compatible platform found
Post: RE: Help me with oclHashcat-plus. ERROR: No AMD/S...
| you're running the wrong binary, should be using cudaHashcat not oclHashcat. oclHashcat is for AMD. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
7 |
29,027 |
04-16-2013, 07:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Post: RE: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
|
atom Wrote: (04-16-2013, 07:08 PM)
--
Yeah I see what you mean. k/s can be easily misread as keys/sec. Maybe I should change this.
--
I would recommend KH/s (kilohashes), MH/s (megahashes), GH/s (g... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
44 |
362,067 |
04-16-2013, 08:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Post: RE: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
|
jpgoldberg Wrote: (04-16-2013, 09:58 PM)
--
The remarkable cracking speeds you have are far more due to what you've done with SHA1 in GPUs, but there is this design flaw as well.
--
a lot of the sh... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
44 |
362,067 |
04-16-2013, 10:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Post: RE: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
| no, that's only half the issue.
the other half of the issue is that 2 blocks of hmac-sha1 are required to generate 320 bits, but only 1 block is required to validate the password. defenders have to d... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
44 |
362,067 |
04-16-2013, 11:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Post: RE: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
| you're assuming brute force, which no one would be dumb enough to do.
a more significant measurement: 3 MH/s means we can get through rockyou in 4.7s, rockyou + d3ad0ne.rule in 90m. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
44 |
362,067 |
04-17-2013, 12:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Attack mode 6, 7 slower than Maskprocessor rulesets?
Post: RE: Attack mode 6, 7 slower than Maskprocessor rul...
| this is to be expected if using only ?d - ?d?d?d with -a 7 because you aren't giving the left side enough work to do. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,937 |
04-17-2013, 07:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Post: RE: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
|
quinndupont Wrote: (04-17-2013, 05:35 AM)
--
Isn't the point of the OCLHashcat optimizations that these are being brute forced? Using a dictionary attack is a whole different ballgame.
--
No way! Br... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
44 |
362,067 |
04-17-2013, 08:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Attack mode 6, 7 slower than Maskprocessor rulesets?
Post: RE: Attack mode 6, 7 slower than Maskprocessor rul...
| you can already do this with rules, look at the rule files in rules/hybrid/. you could do, for example,
Code:
--
-r rules/hybrid/prepend_d.rule -r rules/hybrid/prepend_d.rule -r rules/hybrid/prep... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,937 |
04-18-2013, 05:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Differences of hashcats in v0.42
Post: RE: Differences of hashcats in v0.42
| if you have a recent (current generation) CPU you should be able to use AVX if on Intel, or XOP if on AMD. check your processor flags (e.g. grep xop /proc/cpuinfo) |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
7,024 |
04-19-2013, 02:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 5970 slow?
Post: RE: 5970 slow?
|
uzomoshi Wrote: (04-19-2013, 10:12 AM)
--
This is my benchmark 825/1010. I had to set --gpu-accel=240 instead of 800 because every run was killed. I guess due to insufficient memory (I got 1Gb ram).
... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
12 |
22,929 |
04-19-2013, 01:28 PM |
