Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
|
|
Thread: dictionary attack problem
Post: RE: dictionary attack problem
You should use cpu hashcat. That's why it exists. GPU is not always the best tool for the job. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
5,291 |
12-01-2015, 12:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: dictionary attack problem
Post: RE: dictionary attack problem
You cannot gain any GPU acceleration using a straight dictionary attack against fast hashes, as you have no modifier. To get GPU acceleration you must have some work for the GPU to do (add rules, use ... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
5,291 |
12-01-2015, 09:39 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
Post: RE: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
Technically no, but also technically yes. 390X doesn't currently work with 1.37 because AMD assigned a new codename to the product, so oclHashcat can't map the codename to the appropriate kernels. But... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
10,016 |
12-01-2015, 08:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
Post: RE: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
The 290X and 390X use literally the exact same GPU chip. There is zero difference in performance. The 390X might ship with a slightly higher clock, but you can bump the clock on the 290X just the same... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
10,016 |
12-01-2015, 07:36 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
Post: RE: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
The 390X is not a new card -- it's just a rebranded 290X. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
10,016 |
12-01-2015, 05:27 AM |
|
|
Thread: sql login
Post: RE: sql login
BJENSEN Wrote: (11-30-2015, 12:18 PM)
--
But just to understand: why is it a problem to post hashes?
--
Because we said not to. It's just that simple. The only time it is appropriate to post a hash... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
11,286 |
12-01-2015, 04:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: Need full guide on WPA/WPA2 Hashcat cracking
Post: RE: Need full guide on WPA/WPA2 Hashcat cracking
"Full guide" is code for "I don't want to read and study." |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
10,661 |
12-01-2015, 02:04 AM |
|
|
Thread: Problem with Hashcat and large hashlists
Post: RE: Problem with Hashcat and large hashlists
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
4 |
6,342 |
11-29-2015, 05:46 AM |
|
|
Thread: .zip archive add support
Post: RE: .zip archive add support
1. Feature requests belong on Trac, not the forums.
2. There's already a ticket open for this request, https://hashcat.net/trac/ticket/161, and it has been accepted. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
5,035 |
11-28-2015, 08:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: .onion domain brute
Post: RE: .onion domain brute
First, feature requests belong on Trac, not the forums. Second, generating vanity names and addresses is certainly outside the scope of Hashcat. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
5,257 |
11-28-2015, 08:46 AM |
|
|
Thread: Cracking MD5 of 270 length plain-text -partially know-
Post: RE: Cracking MD5 of 270 length plain-text -partial...
You're not going to be able to use an optimized hash cracking app. Part of those optimizations is removing support for multiple input blocks, which limits the input to 55 bytes. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
6 |
7,924 |
11-27-2015, 10:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: Cracking MD5 of 270 length plain-text -partially know-
Post: RE: Cracking MD5 of 270 length plain-text -partial...
You're not going to be able to use any optimized hash cracking application for this (especially not hashcat), you'll need to use or write a cracker with a generic multiblock MD5 implementation from e.... |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
6 |
7,924 |
11-27-2015, 10:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: PLEASE HELP!_MASK with 8-20 abcABC123...
Post: RE: PLEASE HELP!_MASK with 8-20 abcABC123...
Subcortex Wrote: (11-25-2015, 05:47 AM)
--
So please bann me, hahahaha :-p
--
Ok, done. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
14 |
20,033 |
11-25-2015, 06:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: Multiple GPUs Help
Post: RE: Multiple GPUs Help
2x 970 would show the best performance. But yes, you would need to switch off SLI before using hashcat. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
7,549 |
11-24-2015, 11:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: HD6870 & HD5970 with WPA
Post: RE: HD6870 & HD5970 with WPA
Your -n/-u values do not make any sense. Just use -w 3 instead. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
6,490 |
11-24-2015, 01:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: Permission Denied
Post: RE: Permission Denied
You also don't need to use full paths, relative paths will work just fine. Will make your command line easier to read, and easier to spot errors like this one. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
5 |
8,650 |
11-24-2015, 10:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat v 0.50 "increment error"
Post: RE: Hashcat v 0.50 "increment error"
You don't need to specify --increment-max. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
8,424 |
11-23-2015, 04:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: Wordlist numeric mangling question
Post: RE: Wordlist numeric mangling question
No, this is not possible. Instead strip your wordlist down to basewords and do hybrid attacks. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
5,228 |
11-20-2015, 06:18 AM |
|
|
Thread: HMAC SHA256
Post: RE: HMAC SHA256
This is not the place to request cracks. Read the rules. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
1 |
3,403 |
11-18-2015, 08:58 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat cannot crack NT/LM hash?
Post: RE: oclHashcat cannot crack NT/LM hash?
https://media.blackhat.com/bh-us-12/Briefings/Reynolds/BH_US_12_Reynods_Stamp_Out_Hash_WP.pdf |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
7,301 |
11-18-2015, 01:45 AM |