|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: How would I parse through this to get the correct info?
Post: RE: How would I parse through this to get the corr...
| ./cudaHashcat64.bin is for Linux, cudaHashcat64.exe is for Windows.
... and you're in infosec!? |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
4,854 |
11-06-2015, 01:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: BF fails
Post: RE: BF fails
| It's the same keyspace for both attacks. Do you understand what "-t 10" does?
Hint: Both of your attacks have a keyspace of 10^9. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,136 |
11-06-2015, 07:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Segfault on --show
Post: RE: Segfault on --show
| Does it happen with 1.37 as well? |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,188 |
11-08-2015, 12:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hybrid Attack?
Post: RE: Hybrid Attack?
| Nope, you're wrong. "-a 1 password.txt ?d?l?d?l" wouldn't do anything unless you actually had a file named "?d?l?d?l", and it would only be the same as "-a 6 password.txt ?d?l?d?l" if the file had all... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,262 |
11-11-2015, 04:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Table attack support
Post: RE: Table attack support
| ./hashcat-cli -a 5 --stdout | ./cudaHashcat
Or just use the rule engine to emulate a table attack. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
3,917 |
11-13-2015, 11:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: PDF 1.4 Password hash cracking
Post: RE: PDF 1.4 Password hash cracking
| The reason why you are getting "mask too small" is because of integer overflow. 255^12 > 2^63. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
10,690 |
11-15-2015, 04:34 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Cracking simple sentences
Post: RE: Cracking simple sentences
|
Betawave Wrote: (11-17-2015, 12:39 AM)
--
I DO NOT have a wordlist with phrases
--
You've already identified the best approach. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
11,234 |
11-17-2015, 02:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How to crack hasches in a List, second collum
Post: RE: How to crack hasches in a List, second collum
| You can use the --username switch. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,284 |
11-17-2015, 12:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat cannot crack NT/LM hash?
Post: RE: oclHashcat cannot crack NT/LM hash?
| https://media.blackhat.com/bh-us-12/Briefings/Reynolds/BH_US_12_Reynods_Stamp_Out_Hash_WP.pdf |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
7,301 |
11-18-2015, 01:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Wordlist numeric mangling question
Post: RE: Wordlist numeric mangling question
| No, this is not possible. Instead strip your wordlist down to basewords and do hybrid attacks. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
5,228 |
11-20-2015, 06:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: HD6870 & HD5970 with WPA
Post: RE: HD6870 & HD5970 with WPA
| Your -n/-u values do not make any sense. Just use -w 3 instead. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
6,490 |
11-24-2015, 01:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Multiple GPUs Help
Post: RE: Multiple GPUs Help
| 2x 970 would show the best performance. But yes, you would need to switch off SLI before using hashcat. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
7,549 |
11-24-2015, 11:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: .onion domain brute
Post: RE: .onion domain brute
| First, feature requests belong on Trac, not the forums. Second, generating vanity names and addresses is certainly outside the scope of Hashcat. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
5,257 |
11-28-2015, 08:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: .zip archive add support
Post: RE: .zip archive add support
| 1. Feature requests belong on Trac, not the forums.
2. There's already a ticket open for this request, https://hashcat.net/trac/ticket/161, and it has been accepted. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
5,035 |
11-28-2015, 08:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: sql login
Post: RE: sql login
|
BJENSEN Wrote: (11-30-2015, 12:18 PM)
--
But just to understand: why is it a problem to post hashes?
--
Because we said not to. It's just that simple. The only time it is appropriate to post a hash... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
11,286 |
12-01-2015, 04:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
Post: RE: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
| The 390X is not a new card -- it's just a rebranded 290X. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
10,016 |
12-01-2015, 05:27 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
Post: RE: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
| The 290X and 390X use literally the exact same GPU chip. There is zero difference in performance. The 390X might ship with a slightly higher clock, but you can bump the clock on the 290X just the same... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
10,016 |
12-01-2015, 07:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
Post: RE: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
| Technically no, but also technically yes. 390X doesn't currently work with 1.37 because AMD assigned a new codename to the product, so oclHashcat can't map the codename to the appropriate kernels. But... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
10,016 |
12-01-2015, 08:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: dictionary attack problem
Post: RE: dictionary attack problem
| You cannot gain any GPU acceleration using a straight dictionary attack against fast hashes, as you have no modifier. To get GPU acceleration you must have some work for the GPU to do (add rules, use ... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
5,291 |
12-01-2015, 09:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: dictionary attack problem
Post: RE: dictionary attack problem
| You should use cpu hashcat. That's why it exists. GPU is not always the best tool for the job. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
5,291 |
12-01-2015, 12:24 PM |
