|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| The numbers in your benchmark are actually a bit low. At 925 Mhz, single hash NTLM performance should be about 15700 MH/s per GPU, or 125.6 GH/s total. But actually stock clock for your 7990 should be... |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,139 |
10-20-2013, 08:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| this is more like what you should be seeing for single ntlm brute force:
Code:
--
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s
Session.Name...: oclHashcat-lite
Status.........: Running
Hash.Target..... |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,139 |
10-21-2013, 03:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| i'm just going to leave this right here...
Code:
--
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [b]ypass [q]uit => s
Session.Name...: oclHashcat
Status.........: Running
Input.Mode.....: Mask (?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a... |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,139 |
12-29-2013, 05:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| 8x R9 290X @ 1200 Mhz, Catalyst 13.12, oclHashcat 1.00 |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,139 |
12-30-2013, 01:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| i have yet to get these cards over 72C! but that said, i do get asic hangs at 1200 Mhz at stock voltage. need to adjust the voltage a tick to make them stable. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,139 |
12-30-2013, 03:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| yeah in the benchmarks i did, i tested at a memory clock of 1375 since that is the 7970's default memory clock. not sure if you've seen those or not yet, but i posted a link on twitter. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,139 |
12-30-2013, 05:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: NTLM Hashdump to hashcat/oclHashcat format converter
Post: RE: NTLM Hashdump to hashcat/oclHashcat format con...
| easier, no python requirement"
Code:
--
awk -F: '{print $1 ":" $4}' samdump2.txt
--
also, oclHashcat 1.20 will support pwdump format, etc.
https://pastebin.com/Wqn1QRFi |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
2 |
13,490 |
03-27-2014, 10:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Improving the Rule-based attack
Post: RE: Theory to "Brute force attack rule-based" OR "...
| is there a tl;dr version of this post somewhere? preferably in english?
AmadorBR Wrote: (04-09-2014, 09:57 PM)
--
What makes the process of creating a Herculean labor rules
--
i have absolutely ... |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
6 |
14,362 |
04-09-2014, 11:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Improving the Rule-based attack
Post: RE: Theory to "Brute force attack rule-based" OR "...
| the size would be the same regardless (in terms of keyspace), implementing a mask processor into the rule engine would not change this fact. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
6 |
14,362 |
04-11-2014, 01:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: add feature to LM crack
Post: RE: add feature to LM crack
| feature requests go on trac, not the forums |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
7 |
13,452 |
05-16-2014, 10:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: new function
Post: RE: new function
| seriously guy, requests go on trac, not on the forum. quit being lazy and open an account on trac. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
8 |
14,000 |
05-20-2014, 10:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashtopus illegal character error
Post: RE: Hashtopus illegal character error
| this isn't the appropriate place to seek help with hashtopus. maybe curlyboi can create a forum on his site. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
3 |
8,297 |
07-15-2014, 05:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Keyboard Walks
Post: RE: Keyboard Walks
| Thanks for sharing! At first glance this appears to be very well done. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
11 |
30,805 |
08-15-2014, 02:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Colliding password protected MS office 97-2003 documents
Post: RE: Colliding password protected MS office 97-2003...
| https://moodyeyeview.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/we.png |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
36 |
134,713 |
09-08-2014, 10:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Colliding password protected MS office 97-2003 documents
Post: RE: Colliding password protected MS office 97-2003...
| works for all MS Office 97-2003 files |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
36 |
134,713 |
09-09-2014, 08:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Colliding password protected MS office 97-2003 documents
Post: RE: Colliding password protected MS office 97-2003...
| ?b?b?b?b?b is not for the collision, but for cracking the RC4 key. Once you know the RC4 key, you have the first five bytes of the MD5|SHA1 hash. You then collide that hash to find a password that wor... |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
36 |
134,713 |
10-31-2014, 06:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: feature DVB common scrambling algorithm
Post: RE: feature DVB common scrambling algorithm
| feature requests go on trac, not the forums |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
1 |
6,534 |
11-07-2014, 05:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Colliding password protected MS office 97-2003 documents
Post: RE: Colliding password protected MS office 97-2003...
| https://github.com/stricture/hashstack-server-plugin-oclhashcat/blob/master/scrapers/office2hashcat.py |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
36 |
134,713 |
12-05-2014, 09:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Colliding password protected MS office 97-2003 documents
Post: RE: Colliding password protected MS office 97-2003...
| yes. it's a slightly modified version of office2john.py |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
36 |
134,713 |
12-08-2014, 02:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashtopus - distributed solution
Post: RE: Hashtopus - distributed solution
| mono won't even be necessary in the near future, now that Microsoft is open sourcing .NET and will ship an official .NET Linux runtime. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
289 |
592,182 |
12-19-2014, 01:46 PM |
