|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: 2x7970 clBuildProgram() -11
Post: RE: 2x7970 clBuildProgram() -11
| no, you must use driver fusion. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
14 |
26,026 |
01-31-2013, 04:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2x7970 clBuildProgram() -11
Post: RE: 2x7970 clBuildProgram() -11
| the problem is it changes with nearly each release. someone recently reported that driver fusion cannot cleanly remove 13.2. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
14 |
26,026 |
01-31-2013, 04:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2x7970 clBuildProgram() -11
Post: RE: 2x7970 clBuildProgram() -11
| are you volunteering to create and maintain this wiki article? :) |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
14 |
26,026 |
01-31-2013, 06:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SHA1 key stretching
Post: RE: SHA1 key stretching
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
10,862 |
02-04-2013, 05:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: SHA1 key stretching
Post: RE: SHA1 key stretching
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
10,862 |
02-04-2013, 07:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
| This is a visual bug only, it still finds the correct password. What you are seeing is not a "corrupt" hash, but rather the byte-swapped hash (SHA1 is big endian, x86 is little endian.) This is actual... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
10 |
18,755 |
02-05-2013, 08:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
| Here's some code to illustrate what is happening inside Hashcat:
Code:
--
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
uint32_t hash[5];
uint32_t bswap_hash[5];
s... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
10 |
18,755 |
02-05-2013, 08:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
44,003 |
02-17-2013, 02:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
| But what version of Windows, smartass? :) |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
44,003 |
02-17-2013, 02:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
|
M@LIK Wrote: (02-17-2013, 07:42 PM)
--
epixoip Wrote:
--
But what version of Windows, smartass? :)
--
alexusswe Wrote:
--
Im using Windows 7 64Bit
--
Now what, smartass?
--
Oh I don't know, I don... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
44,003 |
02-18-2013, 07:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
| there's nothing in your screenshot to indicate that the cpu version is not working on your box. looks to me like you didn't really give it much work to do so it finished almost immediately. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
44,003 |
02-23-2013, 09:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
| i see output in your screenshot. if you're looking for the status, you won't see it unless you press 'enter' in that window, just like it tells you. if you gave it a larger workload you would probably... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
44,003 |
02-23-2013, 07:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 7950
Post: RE: Hashcat Lite v.0.14 Crash on start with AMD 79...
| it only writes to the output file if it actually cracks something. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
44,003 |
02-24-2013, 09:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 2x7970 clBuildProgram() -11
Post: RE: 2x7970 clBuildProgram() -11
| SL3 is no longer supported, and using mode 110 as a substitute will not work. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
14 |
26,026 |
02-25-2013, 10:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: No NVidia compatible platform found
Post: RE: No NVidia compatible platform found
| neither dmesg nor lspci are a common or proper way to check if a module is loaded. normally one would do ''lsmod | grep nvidia'' or ''grep nvidia /proc/modules'' |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
26,684 |
03-13-2013, 07:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Trying to understand what I'm doing. SHA1. sha1($pass.$salt)
Post: RE: Trying to understand what I'm doing. SHA1. sha...
| sha1(pass.salt) and sha1(salt.pass) are two different algorithms. if you need sha1(salt.pass) then you cannot use lite.
but if you have a hash in user:hash format, what leads you to believe it is a s... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
23,610 |
03-27-2013, 06:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Trying to understand what I'm doing. SHA1. sha1($pass.$salt)
Post: RE: Trying to understand what I'm doing. SHA1. sha...
| actually i just realized you said you were using a vm, in that case you wouldn't be able to use litecat or pluscat anyway. you can only use hashcat. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
23,610 |
03-27-2013, 08:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Trying to understand what I'm doing. SHA1. sha1($pass.$salt)
Post: RE: Trying to understand what I'm doing. SHA1. sha...
| oh, osx 10.4 hashes, ok. so in that case, you will need to do a little work to use hashcat with this algorithm.
the algorithm is sha1(salt.pass), and the salt is a four-byte hex salt prepended to the... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
23,610 |
03-27-2013, 08:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: nVidia GEFORCE 520M driver install
Post: RE: nVidia GEFORCE 520M driver install
| if you looked at your Xorg log you would see that the nouveau driver is called "nv," not "nouveau." all you need to do is stop x11 and rmmod nv. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
19,937 |
04-26-2013, 07:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: nVidia GEFORCE 520M driver install
Post: RE: nVidia GEFORCE 520M driver install
| "rmmod nv" is the command that you run. you can blacklist it if you wish, but that won't help if it's already loaded.
the page says it requires 310.32 or later, and you have 310.44, so you're fine. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
19,937 |
04-26-2013, 08:15 PM |
