|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: FirePro V7800
Post: RE: FirePro V7800
| Firepro v7800 is an underclocked HD 5850. So old and slow. Moreover, AMD is dropping support for their VLIW5 cards in the next driver release, so you wouldn't be able to use this GPU for very long. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
2 |
4,987 |
12-05-2015, 03:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 2x Nvidia TESLA K80 Benchmark
Post: RE: 2x Nvidia TESLA K80 Benchmark
| Heh, those are some dismal speeds. All four combined are slower than one 980Ti.
As for the 0 H/s, the card is too slow for the given workload. It is unable to hit a checkpoint before the benchmark ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
5 |
9,534 |
12-12-2015, 10:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Password Cracker - Enterprise Constraints
Post: RE: Password Cracker - Enterprise Constraints
| I concur, out of that list Quadro M6000 is your best bet. Kind of a shitty situation though. You could get 4x Titan X for the price of that card :( |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
8 |
12,307 |
12-14-2015, 02:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MH/s, GH/s, MHz, GHz: what does it mean?
Post: RE: MH/s, GH/s, MHz, GHz: what does it mean?
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_prefix#List_of_SI_prefixes |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
5 |
26,008 |
12-14-2015, 08:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MH/s, GH/s, MHz, GHz: what does it mean?
Post: RE: MH/s, GH/s, MHz, GHz: what does it mean?
| Yes, MH/s is "megahashes per second", as in 1000000s of hashes per second.
H/s == Hashes per second
KH/s == Kilohashes per second (Thousands of hashes per second)
MH/s == Megahashes per second (M... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
5 |
26,008 |
12-15-2015, 04:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Password Cracker - Enterprise Constraints
Post: RE: Password Cracker - Enterprise Constraints
| Yes, the Quadro is underclocked -- that's what Quadro and Tesla cards are, underclocked versions of the GTX cards. But it doesn't matter, you can simply push the clocks up. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
8 |
12,307 |
12-16-2015, 02:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [Method?] capture via laptop > crack via desktop VS power laptop
Post: RE: [Method?] capture via laptop > crack via deskt...
| Password cracking businesses are the new lemonade stands.
Wonder if OP has heard of scp and sftp. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
2 |
4,432 |
12-17-2015, 09:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Password Cracker - Enterprise Constraints
Post: RE: Password Cracker - Enterprise Constraints
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
8 |
12,307 |
12-21-2015, 06:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
Post: RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
| No, it's not a nice choice at all. The R9 Nano is a piece of shit, stay far away from it. Don't buy into AMD's lies about low power consumption.
You said you had a HD7990 and it had insane power usag... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,111 |
12-22-2015, 08:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
Post: RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
| You'll likely be fine with the mini if you want to go that route. Normally I'm vehemently opposed to OEM design cards, but the GTX 970 is kind of the exception to the rule for two reasons,
1. The r... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,111 |
12-24-2015, 09:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
Post: RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
| There's no official release date for Pascal. Everything that is out there is all rumors and speculation. And "a lot faster" at pushing pixels rarely translates into faster for password cracking -- we ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,111 |
12-26-2015, 09:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: HD 5850
Post: RE: HD 5850
| 5850 will not be supported for much longer, AMD is dropping VLIW5 support in the next driver release.
I wouldn't buy any AMD card that isn't GCN. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
3 |
5,587 |
12-28-2015, 08:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
Post: RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
| Not necessarily. Floating point operations are handled by the FPUs, not the ALUs. Each CUDA core currently has one FPU and one ALU (referred to in the diagram below as the "FP unit and "INT unit.")
... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,111 |
12-27-2015, 12:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Yet Another Build Review
Post: RE: Yet Another Build Review
| I have no clue why you need 5x 2TB drives, but that chassis only has like 3 internal 3.25" drive bays. Sounds like you should probably pick up a NAS or something in addition to this build, instead of ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
6 |
9,357 |
01-08-2016, 01:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Yet Another Build Review
Post: RE: Yet Another Build Review
| Ditch the rainbow tables. Seriously. They were worthless in 2010 when most everyone stopped using them, they were still worthless in 2012 when everyone else stopped using them, and they're even more w... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
6 |
9,357 |
01-08-2016, 03:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?
| 1. You're comparing single hash speeds to multi-hash speeds, and dict + rules to brute force, etc. These are not an apples v oranges comparisons.
2. My benchmarks are at +250Mhz. You said you're runn... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
7 |
9,884 |
01-18-2016, 01:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?
| Well when you say you're comparing apples and oranges, you're saying 8100 MH/s for brute force, but that must be multi-hash not single hash. Multi-hash loses about 50% performance over single hash, so... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
7 |
9,884 |
01-18-2016, 03:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?
| No. GFLOPS has literally nothing to do with hash cracking, as hash algorithms use integer math, not floating point math. Just because a device is good at floating point math doesn't necessarily mean i... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
7 |
9,884 |
01-18-2016, 06:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?
| Wait, you do not need to physically connect a monitor to card to set the fan speeds! You can simply tell the driver a monitor is connected even when one isn't. This is most easily accomplished with th... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
7 |
9,884 |
01-19-2016, 01:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: PCI Expansion Chassis - Experiences, anyone?
Post: RE: PCI Expansion Chassis - Experiences, anyone?
| They're really expensive and have high latency. The 16-GPU expanders sell for $45k+. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
14 |
21,092 |
01-20-2016, 07:04 PM |
