Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: status from gpu cracking?
Post: RE: status from gpu cracking?
muellgmbh Wrote: (04-04-2013, 04:17 PM)
--
i just tested the hashcat with the following command:
C:\temp\oclHashcat-plus-0.14>cudaHashcat-plus64.exe -m 1800 "$6$wYzevcOJ$VL9PX2u
restofthekeyhere"
... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
18,279 |
04-04-2013, 11:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: status from gpu cracking?
Post: RE: status from gpu cracking?
muellgmbh Wrote: (04-05-2013, 09:19 AM)
--
so my command looks like this:
cudaHashcat-lite64.exe --hash-type 3000 --pw-max 12 1910FFBB5193942509F044CFC6613E92
--
you're still not supplying an atta... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
18,279 |
04-05-2013, 03:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: amd catalyst 13.1
Post: RE: amd catalyst 13.1
SL3 is no longer in hashcat. maybe you should have done some research before you dropped 30k on hardware. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
14,719 |
04-06-2013, 12:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: GTX 670 extreme lag when bruteforcing wpa
Post: RE: GTX 670 extreme lag when bruteforcing wpa
adjust your -n and -u values |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,259 |
04-07-2013, 06:47 AM |
|
|
Thread: What does "MCU" stands for?
Post: RE: What does "MCU" stands for?
MCU is the compute unit, which is a simultaneous multiprocessor. you have 14 of them. on your architecture, each MCU has 8 shaders, which nvidia calls "cuda cores." 8*14 = 112 total shaders. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
16,340 |
04-07-2013, 05:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: What does "MCU" stands for?
Post: RE: What does "MCU" stands for?
not exactly. there's a comprehensive explanation for beginners here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU#A_CPU_is_an_executive |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
16,340 |
04-07-2013, 06:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: What does "MCU" stands for?
Post: RE: What does "MCU" stands for?
yes. keep reading further down that page. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
16,340 |
04-07-2013, 07:11 PM |
|
|
Thread: v0.14 working but unable to quit or exit the program
Post: RE: v0.14 working but unable to quit or exit the p...
yep, 5xxx series was super prone to ASIC hangs with even mild overclocking. there's not much headroom on those cards. i don't go higher than 880 Mhz on my 5870s, and that's with overvolting. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,139 |
04-15-2013, 08:28 AM |
|
|
Thread: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Post: RE: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
atom Wrote: (04-16-2013, 07:08 PM)
--
Yeah I see what you mean. k/s can be easily misread as keys/sec. Maybe I should change this.
--
I would recommend KH/s (kilohashes), MH/s (megahashes), GH/s (g... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
44 |
362,065 |
04-16-2013, 08:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Post: RE: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
jpgoldberg Wrote: (04-16-2013, 09:58 PM)
--
The remarkable cracking speeds you have are far more due to what you've done with SHA1 in GPUs, but there is this design flaw as well.
--
a lot of the sh... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
44 |
362,065 |
04-16-2013, 10:45 PM |
|
|
Thread: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Post: RE: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
no, that's only half the issue.
the other half of the issue is that 2 blocks of hmac-sha1 are required to generate 320 bits, but only 1 block is required to validate the password. defenders have to d... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
44 |
362,065 |
04-16-2013, 11:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Post: RE: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
you're assuming brute force, which no one would be dumb enough to do.
a more significant measurement: 3 MH/s means we can get through rockyou in 4.7s, rockyou + d3ad0ne.rule in 90m. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
44 |
362,065 |
04-17-2013, 12:25 AM |
|
|
Thread: Attack mode 6, 7 slower than Maskprocessor rulesets?
Post: RE: Attack mode 6, 7 slower than Maskprocessor rul...
this is to be expected if using only ?d - ?d?d?d with -a 7 because you aren't giving the left side enough work to do. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,937 |
04-17-2013, 07:29 AM |
|
|
Thread: Attack mode 6, 7 slower than Maskprocessor rulesets?
Post: RE: Attack mode 6, 7 slower than Maskprocessor rul...
you can already do this with rules, look at the rule files in rules/hybrid/. you could do, for example,
Code:
--
-r rules/hybrid/prepend_d.rule -r rules/hybrid/prepend_d.rule -r rules/hybrid/prep... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,937 |
04-18-2013, 05:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: combinator attack : empty dic
Post: RE: combinator attack : empty dic
-j and -k do not work with rules files. they only work with single rules.
if you want to use the append rule then you need to escape it, else your shell will attempt to interpret it as a variable. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
11,356 |
04-19-2013, 01:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: cap2hccap — it's malware...
Post: RE: cap2hccap — it's malware...
what precisely is leading you to conclude it's malware...? especially when the source is available? |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
13,855 |
04-22-2013, 04:31 AM |
|
|
Thread: cap2hccap — it's malware...
Post: RE: cap2hccap — it's malware...
so that you know, all that your debugger was telling you was that umengx86.dll was loaded by the current process, along with a few other shared libraries. there was nothing to indicate that anything w... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
13,855 |
04-22-2013, 04:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Post: RE: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
quinndupont Wrote: (04-17-2013, 05:35 AM)
--
Isn't the point of the OCLHashcat optimizations that these are being brute forced? Using a dictionary attack is a whole different ballgame.
--
No way! Br... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
44 |
362,065 |
04-17-2013, 08:58 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus64 fglrx problem
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus64 fglrx problem
but even when you do get the driver installed, the amd driver no longer supports opencl on radeon hd 4xxx gpus. so you cannot use this gpu with hashcat anyway. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,086 |
04-22-2013, 05:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus64 fglrx problem
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus64 fglrx problem
do not install the app sdk. you must install catalyst 13.1. catalyst 12.10 will not work. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,086 |
04-22-2013, 05:42 PM |