Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
Post: RE: "bug!!" in output / ocl v1.36
It's not Windows-specific, and it's not AMD-specific. I've seen it on Nvidia + Linux. But it doesn't trigger all the time, and it seems to be difficult to reproduce. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
17,475 |
08-24-2015, 08:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: CudaHashcat 1.37 0H/s with Bcrypt
Post: RE: CudaHashcat 1.37 0H/s with Bcrypt
Looks like you've tested 2 candidates in 17 seconds, so your speed is ~ 0.11 H/s.
This is totally expected.
1. bcrypt is very slow, and depending on the cost value (uknown from above output), it... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
6,189 |
08-24-2015, 08:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: CudaHashcat 1.37 0H/s with Bcrypt
Post: RE: CudaHashcat 1.37 0H/s with Bcrypt
There is a reason we tell people to use bcrypt. And, well, you're looking at that reason. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
6,189 |
08-24-2015, 09:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: selective GPU temp abort
Post: RE: selective GPU temp abort
While the 290X is capable of running up to 95C, it shouldn't be getting anywhere near that hot. Especially if the other three cards are water cooled, that 290X really shouldn't be getting any hotter t... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
5,421 |
08-26-2015, 11:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: selective GPU temp abort
Post: RE: selective GPU temp abort
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
5,421 |
08-27-2015, 12:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: Bug in oclHashcat64.exe
Post: RE: Bug in oclHashcat64.exe
yashar26: You're going to start a fire with that configuration. Why are you coupling a $1000 GPU with a $100 PSU? The 295X2 pulls upwards of 550-575W under compute workloads (though Powertune will do ... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
15,456 |
08-27-2015, 01:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: Bug in oclHashcat64.exe
Post: RE: Bug in oclHashcat64.exe
Ok, so in this case your 850W PSU *can't* push 850W, because this isn't actually an 850W PSU. The manufacturer is lying, basically.
Your PSU has a single 12V 70A rail which is only 840W, and you shou... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
15,456 |
08-27-2015, 10:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: Bug in oclHashcat64.exe
Post: RE: Bug in oclHashcat64.exe
That is a strong possibility as well. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
15,456 |
08-28-2015, 03:04 AM |
|
|
Thread: ibm security directory server hash
Post: RE: ibm security directory server hash
Assuming the plaintext provided is a valid password for one of the two hashes, it doesn't appear to be any of the modes Hashcat supports. Tried 1410, 1420, 1430, 1440, 1450, and 1460 to no avail. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
11,571 |
08-28-2015, 11:56 AM |
|
|
Thread: Learning to crack 7z archives
Post: RE: Learning to crack 7z archives
7zip is a very slow algorithm, so your attacks have to be very targeted. Also your GPU is not very good for hash cracking, so you have to be even smarter about your attacks than those with better-perf... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
12,841 |
08-29-2015, 12:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: Learning to crack 7z archives
Post: RE: Learning to crack 7z archives
No, your GPU should be several times faster than your CPU for this. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
12,841 |
08-29-2015, 02:45 AM |
|
|
Thread: RAR3 benchmark
Post: RE: RAR3 benchmark
-b uses -w 3, and 32 is likely too large of a -n value for your GPU. Workload is too large, so speed just hasn't had a chance to update. You can try manually running with a lower -n value. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,170 |
08-31-2015, 09:25 AM |
|
|
Thread: ibm security directory server hash
Post: RE: ibm security directory server hash
Well, you have the hash string "MWw4MjlrM2loajFz:qu0VLHJPa2dNL6+7bRIpcRGcdInpFO6B5OGMgnyEeyM=", we assume the first part is the salt and the second part is the hash. Just convert it from base64 encodi... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
11,571 |
08-29-2015, 12:44 AM |
|
|
Thread: Linux Mint AMD freezes
Post: RE: Linux Mint AMD freezes
Driver version 14.6 is from June 2014, so it's well over a year old. The latest driver is 15.7, released July 2015 (you should be seeing a pattern in AMD's software versioning.) You should either be u... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
9,419 |
09-03-2015, 12:30 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: No NVidia compatible platform found
Post: RE: ERROR: No NVidia compatible platform found
Yes, it's because of RDP. Search the forums, this has been discussed in the past. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,932 |
09-04-2015, 12:50 AM |
|
|
Thread: low performance with prepend more than 3 characters in mask attack
Post: RE: low performance with prepend more than 3 chara...
Benchmark mode performs a single hash brute force of a large keyspace, an ideal scenario that presents the opportunity for maximum optimization. Many of the optimizations are not applicable when attac... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
6,892 |
09-07-2015, 04:25 AM |
|
|
Thread: low performance with prepend more than 3 characters in mask attack
Post: RE: low performance with prepend more than 3 chara...
Of course, it has the exact same effect. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
6,892 |
09-07-2015, 08:02 AM |
|
|
Thread: r9 290x help
Post: RE: r9 290x help
You can't gain any acceleration using a straight dictionary attack against a fast hash. You need to use an amplifier.
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_to_create_mor... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
5,006 |
09-09-2015, 10:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: My first tests
Post: RE: My first tests
You cannot achieve any acceleration with a straight wordlist attack against a fast hash on GPU. You need an amplifier to gain acceleration. This is why your brute force speeds are so much faster. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,119 |
09-14-2015, 06:20 PM |
|
|
Thread: low speed with cudaHashcat64
Post: RE: low speed with cudaHashcat64
Speed looks fine to me. Slow GPU, slow algorithm. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,803 |
09-18-2015, 08:22 PM |