Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
why are you using a dictionary for that |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-14-2013, 09:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
i'm asking you, squadx. why are you using a wordlist for that, when a mask attack would be much faster? |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-16-2013, 12:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
what algorithm, and what gpu? |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-16-2013, 09:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
ok, well that explains why. slow algorithm, slow gpu, extremely odd settings. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-17-2013, 02:58 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
squadx Wrote: (02-16-2013, 07:25 AM)
--
because the password is a guaranteed to be a 10 digit number, no characters...instead of generating the list from 1 - 10, i do it in chunks.
How would a mas... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-16-2013, 08:23 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
our "?d.... command" makes a huge difference on fast gpus with fast hashes. you cannot reach full acceleration with straight dictionary attacks.
your mid-level nvidia gpu is still an nvidia gpu, and ... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-18-2013, 07:15 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
squadx Wrote: (02-18-2013, 08:07 PM)
--
can you use the ?d argument and still limit it to a range? part of the benefit of creating the dictionary is being able to make a dictionary file that is wit... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-19-2013, 05:37 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
I don't think that's what he was asking for, I interpreted is question as "do I have to do 00000000 - 99999999, or can i do 90000000 - 95000000." |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-19-2013, 03:22 PM |
|
|
Thread: Need Help With a new build plz!
Post: RE: Need Help With a new build plz!
alexalex9998 Wrote: (02-20-2015, 12:53 AM)
--
I am going to be cracking MD5 and NTML. Heat is not a problem. Any recommendation for a power supply for 11 R9 290x's?
--
You cannot have 11x 290X in ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
28 |
40,947 |
02-20-2015, 01:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: Need Help With a new build plz!
Post: RE: Need Help With a new build plz!
Look at the block diagram for the board. The board has 4x PLX chips, two per CPU. That means each CPU directly controls two GPUs on two PLX chips. So you need both CPUs. On older models you could get ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
28 |
40,947 |
03-03-2015, 03:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 RC1
ADL_Overdrive5_Temperature_Get(): -5 is a normal error on the 5970. The 5970 has two BIOS installed, a master BIOS and a slave BIOS, to drive the master and slave GPUs respectively. But unlike the 699... |
|
epixoip |
Beta Tester
|
27 |
24,862 |
11-19-2012, 07:55 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 RC1
I'm seeing some good speed increases with the 12.8 build from 0.09. Catalyst 12.9+ isn't working with VCL so I cannot test.
I would really like to stick with 12.8 for a while. Yes it's "old," but i... |
|
epixoip |
Beta Tester
|
27 |
24,862 |
11-23-2012, 09:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow when performing dictionary attack
Post: RE: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow ...
pretty simple, you're not giving the gpus enough work to do. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
27 |
42,109 |
07-22-2014, 03:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow when performing dictionary attack
Post: RE: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow ...
yes, oclHashcat will split the work amongst the gpus in a way that will achieve the most acceleration for the specific attack you are running. however, it has to actually have enough work to do that, ... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
27 |
42,109 |
07-22-2014, 04:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow when performing dictionary attack
Post: RE: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow ...
while it certainly is a good idea to sort your wordlists by length, md5apr is not one of the algorithms affected by the drop in performance nor is he using a VLIW card. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
27 |
42,109 |
07-22-2014, 08:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow when performing dictionary attack
Post: RE: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow ...
USB risers don't actually use USB, they're still PCI-e. running off of a x1 slot will increase host->device transfer times, but not by that much. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
27 |
42,109 |
07-23-2014, 04:27 AM |
|
|
Thread: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow when performing dictionary attack
Post: RE: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow ...
gaming is nothing like compute, you cannot compare the two.
no, it is not constantly streaming like video games. if it was, you wouldn't get any gpu acceleration. use stdin mode on a fast hash and yo... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
27 |
42,109 |
07-23-2014, 09:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow when performing dictionary attack
Post: RE: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow ...
sure, but why do you mention this? |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
27 |
42,109 |
07-23-2014, 09:43 AM |
|
|
Thread: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow when performing dictionary attack
Post: RE: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow ...
ahhh, i see what you're saying. well if that were the case, i would suspect that he wouldn't be getting relatively the same speed out of all four gpus with brute force. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
27 |
42,109 |
07-23-2014, 09:46 AM |
|
|
Thread: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow when performing dictionary attack
Post: RE: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow ...
hm, ok. maybe that is normal behavior for Windows then. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
27 |
42,109 |
07-24-2014, 11:52 AM |