|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: 6 radeon 5850
Post: RE: 6 radeon 5850
| you shouldn't be using crossfire. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
22,873 |
03-12-2013, 04:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 6 radeon 5850
Post: RE: 6 radeon 5850
| get your pcie extenders from cablesaurus.com |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
22,873 |
03-12-2013, 05:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]?
Post: RE: What is performance different between R9 290X ...
| 50% more cost for 36% more speed for 280X vs 290X.
for 290 vs 290X, it's about 20% more speed for 24% more cost. so yeah, it's worth it if you can afford the 290X. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
41,733 |
01-11-2014, 11:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]?
Post: RE: What is performance different between R9 290X ...
| 290X is 1-2% faster than a 6990 for 32-bit register-based algorithms, 90% faster for des-based algorithms, and 50% slower for 64-bit algorithms. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
41,733 |
01-12-2014, 09:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]?
Post: RE: What is performance different between R9 290X ...
| major examples are md4, md5, sha1, sha224, sha256 are 32-bit, sha512 and sha3 are 64-bit. descrypt, oracle 7g, etc are des-based. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
41,733 |
01-13-2014, 08:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]?
Post: RE: What is performance different between R9 290X ...
| nt is based on md4, lm is based on des, ntlmv1 is based on both md4 and des i believe, and i can't recall the precise algorithm for ntlmv2 right now, but i believe it's based on hmac-md5.
yes, 3des... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
41,733 |
01-14-2014, 12:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]?
Post: RE: What is performance different between R9 290X ...
|
LDA Wrote: (01-15-2014, 06:43 PM)
--
Can you give me example of 64-bit algorithms?
--
as stated in post #7 of this thread, sha512 and sha3 are examples of 64-bit aglorithms.
LDA Wrote: (01-15... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
41,733 |
01-15-2014, 07:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Easy way to beat Hashcat? Does oclHashcat support ASCII [NULL]
Post: RE: Easy way to beat Hashcat? Does oclHashcat supp...
| no, oclhashcat supports the full 0x00-0xff range. but i'm not sure you can get oclHashcat to read a null character from an hcchar file since getline(3) is null-terminated. (edit: actually no, it does ... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
15 |
29,453 |
07-03-2014, 07:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Easy way to beat Hashcat? Does oclHashcat support ASCII [NULL]
Post: RE: Easy way to beat Hashcat? Does oclHashcat supp...
| you're missing the most important part, and that is the fact that the specific algorithm you are trying to crack is not supported.
-m 4500 is sha1_hex(sha1_hex(pass))
your algorithm is sha1_hex(... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
15 |
29,453 |
07-03-2014, 10:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]?
Post: RE: What is performance different between R9 290X ...
| When in doubt, buy a 290X. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
41,733 |
08-15-2014, 11:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.30
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.30
| hashcat-gui has been deprecated for a couple years now. if you're asking about HashcatGUI, that is a third-party utility that is not developed nor supported by hashcat. you will need to inquire about ... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Announcements
|
15 |
59,504 |
09-14-2014, 02:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Asrock H81 & Radeon 7990 incompatibility
Post: RE: Asrock H81 & Radeon 7990 incompatibility
| the short beeps are likely related to 32-bit PCIe addressing. see if your bios has an option called "Above 4G Decoding" and if so, enable it. if it doesn't, then your board is not capable of 64-bit PC... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
27,298 |
09-30-2014, 10:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Asrock H81 & Radeon 7990 incompatibility
Post: RE: Asrock H81 & Radeon 7990 incompatibility
| No, it's not a Windows issue, it's an AMD driver issue. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
27,298 |
09-30-2014, 11:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Asrock H81 & Radeon 7990 incompatibility
Post: RE: Asrock H81 & Radeon 7990 incompatibility
| You're not really paying attention to what has been said.
Your BIOS does not have the "Above 4G decoding" option, and therefore does not support 64-bit PCI-e addressing. That's why you're not able ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
27,298 |
10-01-2014, 12:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Asrock H81 & Radeon 7990 incompatibility
Post: RE: Asrock H81 & Radeon 7990 incompatibility
| 7950 is a single GPU card. 7990 is a dual GPU card. Each 7990 counts as two GPUs. So you're trying to connect 12 GPUs to the board. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
27,298 |
10-02-2014, 12:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Asrock H81 & Radeon 7990 incompatibility
Post: RE: Asrock H81 & Radeon 7990 incompatibility
| 4x 7990 is 8 GPUs. That's the maximum the AMD driver supports. Not sure what you're not understanding about that. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
27,298 |
10-03-2014, 09:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12
Post: RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12
| On the plus side, I'm pleased with the gains for Office97, that actually brings it up to 980 performance.
But I think some investigation is needed. It's strange to me that DEScrypt would go down so... |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
15 |
31,299 |
12-22-2014, 07:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12
Post: RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12
| The front page only has benchmarks for 8x 290X, not a single 290X. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
15 |
31,299 |
12-29-2014, 06:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12
Post: RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
15 |
31,299 |
12-30-2014, 11:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12
Post: RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
15 |
31,299 |
01-09-2015, 10:35 PM |
