Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: how to limit password character length
Post: RE: how to limit password character length
No, like this:
Code:
--
echo " |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
10 |
16,257 |
03-02-2015, 06:30 AM |
|
|
Thread: how to limit password character length
Post: RE: how to limit password character length
Works here:
Code:
--
epixoip@token:~$ echo " |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
10 |
16,257 |
03-02-2015, 06:44 AM |
|
|
Thread: how to limit password character length
Post: RE: how to limit password character length
Too much overhead checking the length of each candidate. You can try using the other rule instead. Edit the rule file and replace |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
10 |
16,257 |
03-02-2015, 06:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: how to limit password character length
Post: RE: how to limit password character length
Yeah, slightly faster but not near as fast as not filtering at all. String manipulation is just too slow.
So in this case what I'd suggest doing is pre-filtering your wordlist.
Code:
--
awk '... |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
10 |
16,257 |
03-02-2015, 07:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: encrypted wallet
Post: RE: encrypted wallet
oclHashcat 1.35 does not support wallet.dat. This functionality was added in 1.36, which has not yet been released. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
10 |
18,333 |
04-22-2015, 07:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: Looking for the best setup for 500kh/s or 1000kh/s on WPA/WPA2
Post: RE: Looking for the best setup for 500kh/s or 1000...
3x GTX 970, ~ $960, ~ 510 KH/s |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
16,723 |
07-28-2015, 07:35 PM |
|
|
Thread: ocl v1.36 / WARN: ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get(): -5
Post: RE: ocl v1.36 / WARN: ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get(...
oclHashcat just reads this information from ADL, so it's not a hashcat issue. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
16,070 |
08-03-2015, 08:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: ocl v1.36 / WARN: ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get(): -5
Post: RE: ocl v1.36 / WARN: ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get(...
Oh, yeah, that's a really good point, philsmd. I've received several bug reports for od6config where people are using OEM design R9 cards that are still shipping with OD5 firmware. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
16,070 |
08-22-2015, 09:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
Post: RE: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
Not really enough information to go off of. Which CPUs specifically? |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,229 |
09-16-2015, 06:58 PM |
|
|
Thread: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
Post: RE: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
In this specific instance the single X5690 will be faster.
E5430 - quad core, no HT
X5690 - six core with HT
That's 8 threads @ 2.66 Ghz vs 12 threads @ 3.46 ~ 3.73 Ghz. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,229 |
09-16-2015, 08:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
Post: RE: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
That's a fair question. I'm assuming this is old, decommissioned hardware that being sold for like $10 or something (at least I hope he's not paying more than that for it.) It will be noisy and power-... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,229 |
09-16-2015, 09:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
Post: RE: Single CPU vs Dual CPU & Hashcat
Hmm, stretching my memory to remember and too lazy to Google, but I *believe* the X5690 is equivalent to an i7 990X. So it was a pretty sweet processor for its time, but it *is* nearly 5 years old.
... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,229 |
09-17-2015, 07:43 AM |
|
|
Thread: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
Post: RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
No, it's not a nice choice at all. The R9 Nano is a piece of shit, stay far away from it. Don't buy into AMD's lies about low power consumption.
You said you had a HD7990 and it had insane power usag... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,111 |
12-22-2015, 08:21 AM |
|
|
Thread: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
Post: RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
You'll likely be fine with the mini if you want to go that route. Normally I'm vehemently opposed to OEM design cards, but the GTX 970 is kind of the exception to the rule for two reasons,
1. The r... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,111 |
12-24-2015, 09:36 PM |
|
|
Thread: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
Post: RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
There's no official release date for Pascal. Everything that is out there is all rumors and speculation. And "a lot faster" at pushing pixels rarely translates into faster for password cracking -- we ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,111 |
12-26-2015, 09:51 AM |
|
|
Thread: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
Post: RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
Not necessarily. Floating point operations are handled by the FPUs, not the ALUs. Each CUDA core currently has one FPU and one ALU (referred to in the diagram below as the "FP unit and "INT unit.")
... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,111 |
12-27-2015, 12:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: Thoughts on Pascal?
Post: RE: Thoughts on Pascal?
No actual technical specs have been released for Pascal, just various sound bites, so everything out there is just rumor and speculation and we really have no idea how much faster Pascal might be. You... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,893 |
02-15-2016, 04:44 AM |
|
|
Thread: Thoughts on Pascal?
Post: RE: Thoughts on Pascal?
I've been hearing end of June, but again, these are all just rumors. The people who know for sure aren't saying a word. Same regarding performance, we have no official details on this new architecture... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
14,893 |
03-13-2016, 03:00 AM |
|
|
Thread: TC password found, wrong?
Post: RE: TC password found, wrong?
It's possible it's a false positive but the odds are pretty low. Especially if the password it found make sense. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
15,462 |
03-29-2016, 01:15 AM |
|
|
Thread: NVidia Pascal P100 announced
Post: RE: NVidia Pascal P100 announced
It doesn't look like it will be that big of a jump over Maxwell, based on the numbers Nvidia published today it looks like it might be ~ 16% faster than Titan X. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
18,288 |
04-05-2016, 10:06 PM |