Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Proper Airflow and Case Selection
Post: RE: Proper Airflow and Case Selection
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-2375.html |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
9 |
16,322 |
11-14-2013, 03:16 AM |
|
|
Thread: Proper Airflow and Case Selection
Post: RE: Proper Airflow and Case Selection
no, i'm definitely not a fan of water cooling. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
9 |
16,322 |
11-15-2013, 03:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
Post: RE: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
why would you use -u 320 for wpa? that doesn't make any sense. use -u 4096
Code:
--
epixoip@butters:~/oclHashcat-1.01$ ./oclHashcat64.bin -m 2500 -b
oclHashcat v1.01 starting in benchmark-mode.... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
18,769 |
01-06-2014, 07:45 AM |
|
|
Thread: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
Post: RE: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
did you prepare your wordlists? |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
18,769 |
01-06-2014, 09:49 AM |
|
|
Thread: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
Post: RE: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
hm, that's really weird. are you giving them enough work to do? maybe you can post the output of `s' during a run. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
18,769 |
01-07-2014, 05:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
Post: RE: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
ah yep, that's it. he's cracking 10 different hashes with 10 different salts. 13099 * 10 = 130990 H/s which is the expected speed. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
18,769 |
01-07-2014, 08:02 AM |
|
|
Thread: Brutforce too slow? / Increment-Problems [Solved]
Post: RE: Brutforce too slow?
you don't need to define a custom character set for a single character class. instead of
Code:
--
-1 ?d ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
--
you can simply do
Code:
--
?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d
--
of course since your mask... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
29,022 |
01-08-2014, 06:23 AM |
|
|
Thread: v1.01 lower WPA speed
Post: RE: v1.01 lower WPA speed
looks like you're probably trying to crack two handshakes at once instead of one. remember that v1.00 added multi-cap support so you need to clean your cap file to ensure you're only cracking the one ... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
14,293 |
01-10-2014, 06:15 AM |
|
|
Thread: v1.01 lower WPA speed
Post: RE: v1.01 lower WPA speed
post your command line & full output.
also, why on earth would you use -n 160 -u 1024 for wpa? should be using something more like -n 32 -u 4096 |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
14,293 |
01-11-2014, 12:02 AM |
|
|
Thread: v1.01 lower WPA speed
Post: RE: v1.01 lower WPA speed
humor me and try again with -n 32 -u 4096 |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
14,293 |
01-11-2014, 11:34 PM |
|
|
Thread: v1.01 lower WPA speed
Post: RE: v1.01 lower WPA speed
this does not make any sense, you should definitely show much better performance with -u 4096 than -u 1024. the explanation of these parameters has been covered dozens of times before, but to re-itera... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
14,293 |
01-12-2014, 03:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?
Post: RE: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?
oclHaschat only implements a single block of sha256, therefore total input (salt + plain) cannot exceed the size of one block. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
16,286 |
02-13-2014, 08:35 PM |
|
|
Thread: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?
Post: RE: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
16,286 |
02-13-2014, 08:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?
Post: RE: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?
yes. and it does crack the password. except there does seem to be a bug as it does mangle up the plaintext.
Code:
--
epixoip@token:~/oclHashcat-1.02$ ./oclHashcat64.bin -d 1 -n 1 -m 1410 ~/example_... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
16,286 |
02-13-2014, 09:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?
Post: RE: SHA256 bug when salt is really big?
Ah ok, yeah, that's more clear. So yes, you should file a bug report about this on Trac. Might also want to include the bug in my example as well, where it cracked "1234567" as "4321[76" (not just a d... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
16,286 |
02-13-2014, 09:59 PM |
|
|
Thread: Recover NTLM with charset: !@$etaoinshrdlu134579
Post: RE: Recover NTLM with charset: !@$etaoinshrdlu1345...
simply define that as a custom charset, then use that custom charset in your mask. you will need to encase that string in single quotes though to prevent your shell from expanding the ! and $ |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
17,221 |
02-23-2014, 12:33 AM |
|
|
Thread: sha512crypt issue
Post: RE: sha512crypt issue
Phenom x4 is your CPU. mastercracker asked about your GPU. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
13,806 |
03-03-2014, 03:39 AM |
|
|
Thread: Strange Performance Issue / R290X
Post: RE: Strange Performance Issue / R290X
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
9 |
16,662 |
04-01-2014, 08:17 AM |
|
|
Thread: Strange Performance Issue / R290X
Post: RE: Strange Performance Issue / R290X
Quote:
--
Fan Speed : 0% (0 RPM)
--
something is not right there. i wonder if that gpu is not broken. might consider RMAing it. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
9 |
16,662 |
04-02-2014, 06:07 AM |
|
|
Thread: Strange Performance Issue / R290X
Post: RE: Strange Performance Issue / R290X
ah ok, you're passively cooling it. cool :)
i have no explanation for the speed difference, maybe it's just a lower binned chip. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
9 |
16,662 |
04-02-2014, 01:52 PM |