|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Disable message about outdated version
Post: RE: Disable message about outdated version
| No, this has absolutely nothing to do with the timebomb. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
8,657 |
01-13-2016, 08:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?
| 1. You're comparing single hash speeds to multi-hash speeds, and dict + rules to brute force, etc. These are not an apples v oranges comparisons.
2. My benchmarks are at +250Mhz. You said you're runn... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
7 |
9,884 |
01-18-2016, 01:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?
| Well when you say you're comparing apples and oranges, you're saying 8100 MH/s for brute force, but that must be multi-hash not single hash. Multi-hash loses about 50% performance over single hash, so... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
7 |
9,884 |
01-18-2016, 03:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?
| No. GFLOPS has literally nothing to do with hash cracking, as hash algorithms use integer math, not floating point math. Just because a device is good at floating point math doesn't necessarily mean i... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
7 |
9,884 |
01-18-2016, 06:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 970 underperforming?
Post: RE: 970 underperforming?
| Wait, you do not need to physically connect a monitor to card to set the fan speeds! You can simply tell the driver a monitor is connected even when one isn't. This is most easily accomplished with th... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
7 |
9,884 |
01-19-2016, 01:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: About the performance in the homepage of oclHashcat
Post: RE: About the performance in the homepage of oclHa...
| PC3 & PC4 referenced on the front page are both a Sagitta Brutalis. PC3 is an S3480X-GTX-TITANX and PC4 is an S2480X-RAD-290X (discontinued.) |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
7 |
10,069 |
01-27-2016, 05:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD R9 390x benchmark
Post: RE: AMD R9 390x benchmark
| Yes, this is the same card as the 290X, only not available in reference design.
No, this is not with stock clocks. You can see from the benchmark he's overclocked to 1070 Mhz. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
7 |
11,571 |
01-29-2016, 09:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD R9 390x benchmark
Post: RE: AMD R9 390x benchmark
| Sure, it could be a factory overclock, but still an overclock none the less. Stock clock for that chip is 1000 Mhz.
And 390X is not "almost the same" as a 290X, they are literally the same GPU. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
7 |
11,571 |
02-01-2016, 09:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: cudaHashcat 0 H/s bcrypt
Post: RE: cudaHashcat 0 H/s bcrypt
| 0 H/s in this case doesn't mean literally "no hashes per second", it means the kernel is taking too long to run and hasn't reached a checkpoint yet and thus the main thread is not able to calculate th... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
14,071 |
04-04-2016, 07:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Mask generator not working?
Post: RE: Mask generator not working?
| Is it iterating over binary or hex-encoded sha256? |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
7 |
10,508 |
04-09-2016, 07:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Mask generator not working?
Post: RE: Mask generator not working?
| The best way to handle this would be to add a new mode that can do iterated sha256. If it were binary I'd say base it off of 7400, but since it's hex you'll have to do a bit more work. Would probably ... |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
7 |
10,508 |
04-09-2016, 09:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OSX 10.10 hash
Post: RE: OSX 10.10 hash
| Looks like you have some garbage characters before the start of the hash? hash.txt needs to be a plain ascii text file with no encoding, and only the hash itself should be in the file. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
7 |
12,569 |
04-15-2016, 08:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OSX 10.10 hash
Post: RE: OSX 10.10 hash
| The options you provided would search for loweralphanumeric passwords that are exactly five characters long. With these options, hashcat will run until it either finds the password, or has exhausted t... |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
7 |
12,569 |
04-16-2016, 06:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Support for Nvidia GeForce 9300M GS
Post: RE: Support for Nvidia GeForce 9300M GS
| Nvidia no longer supports your GPU, that's what the error message is trying to tell you. You can't change the version of your shader model, that version is simply describing the physical capabilities ... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
8,013 |
04-17-2016, 09:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Support for Nvidia GeForce 9300M GS
Post: RE: Support for Nvidia GeForce 9300M GS
| Doesn't make any sense that it would be faster under vmware, what version are you using?
No, your 9300M likely isn't faster than your CPU. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
8,013 |
04-17-2016, 11:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Support for Nvidia GeForce 9300M GS
Post: RE: Support for Nvidia GeForce 9300M GS
| Don't use hashcat, use latest oclHashcat beta with CPU OpenCL driver |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
8,013 |
04-18-2016, 07:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Input.Mode max 8?
Post: RE: Input.Mode max 8?
| You should probably show us your command line |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
7,441 |
05-10-2016, 10:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Input.Mode max 8?
Post: RE: Input.Mode max 8?
| You're using -i, that's why. You should probably know what the switches you're using mean. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
7,441 |
05-10-2016, 10:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Input.Mode max 8?
Post: RE: Input.Mode max 8?
| Oh we all knew, just wanted to verify ;) |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
7,441 |
05-11-2016, 12:24 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Input.Mode max 8?
Post: RE: Input.Mode max 8?
| It's not the max, it will just take a very long time to brute force length 8 before moving to length 9 (if it ever does.) If you actually want to brute force length 10 (impossible) without brute forci... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
7,441 |
05-11-2016, 03:01 AM |
