|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
| I would kind of like to see a rolling contest, one that never really ends. Make it an automated website so there's no manual work involved. You just submit your ruleset, it tallies up the score, then ... |
|
epixoip |
Organisation and Events
|
34 |
64,148 |
04-24-2015, 03:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
|
epixoip |
Organisation and Events
|
34 |
64,148 |
04-24-2015, 11:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| R9 Fury X was never the best.
GTX 1080 Ti and GTX Titan XP should have clock-for-clock identical performance. But it won't have the best bang for the buck. If we look at MD5 perf per dollar:
GTX... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-01-2017, 05:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| Well... Yes and no ;)
You're correct: you should take the total build cost into consideration. There's a reason we do not offer the GTX 1070 in the Brutalis in a clustered configuration, it throws t... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-02-2017, 03:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| Yeah I didn't realize until later that the price points Nvidia advertised were for OEM cards, not FE. We used FE prices when calculating the new Brutalis price points.
However, if you're simply looki... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-02-2017, 08:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| Everyone please note: when Flomac says "So new is always better in energy terms. And the performance of a GPU generation scales very good under hashcat. 30% more performance result in 30% more energy ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-11-2017, 04:35 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
|
NikosD Wrote: (03-11-2017, 09:00 AM)
--
VEGA is already faster than 1080 in OpenCL benchmarks. Take a look at the bitcoin mining.
--
I'm not inclined to believe that, as I just had a long discussio... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-11-2017, 08:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| My heart is pretty big, but you're way more optimistic about AMD than I am ;) |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-11-2017, 11:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| My pessimism is grounded in realism though ;) Keep in mind that Bitweasil and I predicted AMD's sharp downturn back in 2012. Even though the 7970 had just been released and was by all rights a fantast... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,208 |
03-12-2017, 08:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
| it really does not matter that it is reporting the memory size incorrectly. it's a cosmetic "defect" only and does not impact anything. and no, it's not hashcat's fault.
but you DO need cat 13.1. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-02-2013, 11:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
| it's stopping because you don't have catalyst 13.1 installed, not because it thinks you have 512MB of ram.
you may think you have it installed, but you don't. you're still using the old version. you ... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-02-2013, 11:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
| Hm, perplexing. Everything looks okay, but something must not be right. Atom does several checks to ensure that all of the libraries being loaded belong to the correct driver version. Something is fai... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-03-2013, 12:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
| The way I upgraded my servers from 12.8 to 13.1 was:
Code:
--
stop lightdm
sh amd-driver-installer-8.982-x86.x86_64.run --uninstall=force
rm -f /etc/X11/xorg.conf*
reboot -f
sh amd-driver-installer... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-03-2013, 01:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
| you're the only person to report such an issue, and all of your symptoms point toward bad driver install. something just isn't right with your setup. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-04-2013, 06:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
| i have now upgraded seven different machines to 13.1, and i cannot reproduce :/
atom is at a conference this week, but hopefully he will get a chance to read this thread. i'm not sure what all of th... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-05-2013, 05:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
|
Wolf_Blitzer Wrote: (02-04-2013, 07:16 PM)
--
Please, show me where it's wrong.
We've covered that my driver is installed correctly. I even used your method removing it and installing it again, bu... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-04-2013, 08:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
| Do you have the APP SDK installed? |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-06-2013, 09:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
| atom is right, your libOpenCL is the wrong version. this is the libOpenCL that ships with 13.1:
Code:
--
epixoip@butters:~$ clinfo | grep 'Version:'
Platform Version: ... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-06-2013, 09:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
|
atom Wrote: (05-17-2013, 03:48 PM)
--
I'm not sure if it's taped, question for epixoip :)
--
The best way to know is to actually come to the conference, and see if we are videotaping the talks :) |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,766 |
05-17-2013, 08:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
| 7970 speeds:
Code:
--
Hash.Type......: TrueCrypt 5.0+ / PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 / AES
Speed.GPU.#1...: 116.7 kH/s
Hash.Type......: TrueCrypt 5.0+ / PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 / AES
Speed.GPU.#1...:... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,766 |
05-18-2013, 02:34 PM |
