|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: nvidia Quadro P400
Post: RE: nvidia Quadro P400
| Why are you considering these cards? |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
32 |
35,798 |
04-07-2017, 11:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: nvidia Quadro P400
Post: RE: nvidia Quadro P400
| When on a tight budget, turn to the used market. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
32 |
35,798 |
04-11-2017, 11:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: nvidia Quadro P400
Post: RE: nvidia Quadro P400
| Professional graphics cards are slower and way more expensive than their desktop counterparts. There's no reason to pay the upcharge. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
32 |
35,798 |
04-12-2017, 08:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: nvidia Quadro P400
Post: RE: nvidia Quadro P400
| The GTX 1060 certainly isn't a legacy product. You haven't a clue what you're talking about. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
32 |
35,798 |
04-14-2017, 05:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: nvidia Quadro P400
Post: RE: nvidia Quadro P400
| The card was only released 9 months ago, bro. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
32 |
35,798 |
04-15-2017, 12:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: nvidia Quadro P400
Post: RE: nvidia Quadro P400
| Quadro 600 is a Fermi card from 2010 and is absolutely no longer supported. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
32 |
35,798 |
04-17-2017, 01:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: nvidia Quadro P400
Post: RE: nvidia Quadro P400
|
ejonesss Wrote: (04-18-2017, 08:58 PM)
--
epixoip Wrote: (04-17-2017, 01:13 AM)
--
Quadro 600 is a Fermi card from 2010 and is absolutely no longer supported.
--
if it is no longer supported then h... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
32 |
35,798 |
04-23-2017, 10:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
| All recent beta testing was done with Catalyst 13.8 beta1. It's not directly linked anywhere on AMD's website, so I'll provide the URL here:
https://www2.ati.com/drivers/beta/amd-catalyst-13.8-beta1... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
31 |
215,942 |
08-26-2013, 03:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
|
pongsakm Wrote: (08-27-2013, 04:27 AM)
--
I'm use ATI4670+Driver Latest Version 13.4
--
There is no 13.4 for Radeon HD 4xxx. You're using 13.4 Legacy, which is really something like 12.6. AMD no lo... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
31 |
215,942 |
08-27-2013, 08:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat benchmark with Apple CPU + GPU
Post: RE: oclHashcat benchmark with Apple CPU + GPU
| You are confusing --opencl-device-type for --opencl-devices. When you specify ''--opencl-device-type 3'' you're telling oclHashcat to only use devices which present themselves as CL_DEVICE_TYPE_ACCELE... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
31 |
51,170 |
02-01-2016, 07:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat benchmark with Apple CPU + GPU
Post: RE: oclHashcat benchmark with Apple CPU + GPU
| For the price of that expansion chassis, you could build a complete 4-GPU server. And using that expander means your laptop is no longer mobile, you're tied to your desk. And you have to have all thos... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
31 |
51,170 |
02-25-2016, 06:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat benchmark with Apple CPU + GPU
Post: RE: oclHashcat benchmark with Apple CPU + GPU
| Not sure why you'd invest this much in an Apple platform when we know how buggy OpenCL is on OS X, but okay. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
31 |
51,170 |
03-05-2016, 10:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat benchmark with Apple CPU + GPU
Post: RE: oclHashcat benchmark with Apple CPU + GPU
| He actually is running "2.10," there is no 2.01 release that runs on OSX. The version from git reports 2.01 followed by the git commit hash, which is the number that really matters. He's using version... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
31 |
51,170 |
04-29-2016, 05:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
| it's also still GCN, not GCN2. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
09-26-2013, 07:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
| AMD published some teasers back in December of last year, but haven't said a word about it since. they continue to release GCN-based GPUs, so i presume GCN2 just simply doesn't exist. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
09-27-2013, 10:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
|
Gig11gs Wrote: (09-30-2013, 11:16 AM)
--
R9 260X and above are GCN 2.0 based
--
no, this was a pre-release rumor. all the official materials from AMD say it's GCN, not GCN2. show me something offic... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-01-2013, 03:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
| ok. so, assuming the rumored core configuration is correct, we can conservatively expect a 25-30% increase in performance over the 7970 Ghz Edition, and optimistically expect a 37.5% increase. and pos... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-02-2013, 10:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
| nah, it's not risky. that's precisely what the r&d budget is for ;) we'll toss 8 into a tyan ft77 and see how they perform. if they aren't stellar, we can still use them internally. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-02-2013, 05:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
| i'll let you know when we are hiring ;) |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-03-2013, 06:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: AMD Radeon R9 290X
| ouch, that price! you can buy 2x 7990 for that... but i wonder if it's more because it's a special edition or whatever. or maybe this company is just being greedy, trying to rip off the suckers like m... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
30 |
61,916 |
10-03-2013, 12:52 PM |
