Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Help for a rule or command
Post: RE: Help for a rule or command
Right, that's why you don't store it, you'd pipe it into a cracker. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
7,512 |
09-26-2015, 09:05 AM |
|
|
Thread: HashCat GPU
Post: RE: HashCat GPU
I feel like a Markov bot wrote that post. Also we should rename the program to "HESHKAT". |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
8,334 |
10-01-2015, 11:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: v 0.49 increment min equivalent
Post: RE: v 0.49 increment min equivalent
hashcat doesn't support hcmask files, only oclHashcat. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
7,265 |
10-03-2015, 07:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: v 0.49 increment min equivalent
Post: RE: v 0.49 increment min equivalent
Oh, must have missed that change. Never mind then :) |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
7,265 |
10-05-2015, 07:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: Speed reduction
Post: RE: Speed reduction
Left half of the mask is too small to gain any acceleration. Learn how the program works. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
6,584 |
10-13-2015, 11:55 AM |
|
|
Thread: Speed reduction
Post: RE: Speed reduction
Because the left mask keyspace is too small and therefore you're not giving the GPU enough work to do. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
6,584 |
10-14-2015, 01:46 AM |
|
|
Thread: rockyou - hidden code !?
Post: RE: rockyou - hidden code !?
I heard if you tac rockyou.txt it plays a satanic message |
|
epixoip |
General Talk
|
5 |
8,435 |
10-14-2015, 11:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: RAR hash cracking problems
Post: RE: RAR hash cracking problems
-m 12500 supports a max of 20 chars in -a 0, so your candidates shouldn't be rejected. And indeed I cannot reproduce this with 1.37 using the command you provided:
Code:
--
sagitta@inceptus:~/cu... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
7,454 |
10-17-2015, 09:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: RAR hash cracking problems
Post: RE: RAR hash cracking problems
Ah ok, that makes more sense then. But yeah, there's a 20-char limit for this algorithm. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
7,454 |
10-17-2015, 10:38 AM |
|
|
Thread: RAR hash cracking problems
Post: RE: RAR hash cracking problems
No, there's no way to get around it. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
7,454 |
10-17-2015, 01:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat cannot crack NT/LM hash?
Post: RE: oclHashcat cannot crack NT/LM hash?
https://media.blackhat.com/bh-us-12/Briefings/Reynolds/BH_US_12_Reynods_Stamp_Out_Hash_WP.pdf |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
7,301 |
11-18-2015, 01:45 AM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat v 0.50 "increment error"
Post: RE: Hashcat v 0.50 "increment error"
You don't need to specify --increment-max. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
8,424 |
11-23-2015, 04:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: Permission Denied
Post: RE: Permission Denied
You also don't need to use full paths, relative paths will work just fine. Will make your command line easier to read, and easier to spot errors like this one. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
5 |
8,650 |
11-24-2015, 10:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: HD6870 & HD5970 with WPA
Post: RE: HD6870 & HD5970 with WPA
Your -n/-u values do not make any sense. Just use -w 3 instead. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
6,490 |
11-24-2015, 01:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: Another gpu question
Post: RE: Another gpu question
Correct, it is not a reference card, it is an OEM design based on the old GTX 670 reference design. Furthermore, the old "if it has 'GAMING' in the title it's not reference design" line really applies... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
5 |
7,598 |
12-04-2015, 09:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: Source code?
Post: RE: Source code?
Hashcat source *is* available ;)
https://github.com/hashcat
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-4880-post-27401.html |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
5 |
7,920 |
12-04-2015, 06:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: 2x Nvidia TESLA K80 Benchmark
Post: RE: 2x Nvidia TESLA K80 Benchmark
Heh, those are some dismal speeds. All four combined are slower than one 980Ti.
As for the 0 H/s, the card is too slow for the given workload. It is unable to hit a checkpoint before the benchmark ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
5 |
9,534 |
12-12-2015, 10:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: MH/s, GH/s, MHz, GHz: what does it mean?
Post: RE: MH/s, GH/s, MHz, GHz: what does it mean?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_prefix#List_of_SI_prefixes |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
5 |
26,008 |
12-14-2015, 08:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: MH/s, GH/s, MHz, GHz: what does it mean?
Post: RE: MH/s, GH/s, MHz, GHz: what does it mean?
Yes, MH/s is "megahashes per second", as in 1000000s of hashes per second.
H/s == Hashes per second
KH/s == Kilohashes per second (Thousands of hashes per second)
MH/s == Megahashes per second (M... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
5 |
26,008 |
12-15-2015, 04:51 AM |
|
|
Thread: Identify hash
Post: RE: Identify hash
decode it and reencode it as base16 |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
5 |
7,442 |
12-22-2015, 02:54 AM |