Search Results
|
Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: GTX 1070 & 1080
Post: GTX 1070 & 1080
One of you was going to start this thread anyway, so I figured I'd be the one to do it.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
2560 cores
1607 MHz base clock, 1733 MHz boost clock
8GB GDDR5X
180W, 1x 8pin power
... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
49 |
100,010 |
05-07-2016, 05:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: GTX 1070 & 1080
Post: RE: GTX 1070 & 1080
Oh, bullshit you did!
Flomac Wrote: (04-11-2016, 07:26 PM)
--
epixoip Wrote: (04-10-2016, 07:26 AM)
--
Anyway I think you're crazy, 50% is way off base from what will happen in reality. I'm still... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
49 |
100,010 |
05-07-2016, 08:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: GTX 1070 & 1080
Post: RE: GTX 1070 & 1080
Flomac Wrote: (05-07-2016, 09:05 AM)
--
I respect your knowledge but in this case you were miles away from being right.
--
I was joking but I also wasn't "miles away from being right." Looks like y... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
49 |
100,010 |
05-07-2016, 09:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: GTX 1070 & 1080
Post: RE: GTX 1070 & 1080
Yes, the $600 MSRP for the GTX 1080 is covered in the first post. The GTX 900 series cards have already been marked down. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
49 |
100,010 |
05-08-2016, 09:38 AM |
|
|
Thread: Hash seems simple but i can't identify it
Post: RE: Hash seems simple but i can't identify it
Hash identification programs like HashID are worthless because the only hashes that can be positively identified are those that have signatures, and if a hash has a signature, you don't need some prog... |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
6,912 |
05-08-2016, 09:41 AM |
|
|
Thread: First time trying to "crack" something
Post: RE: First time trying to "crack" something
If neither -m 6600 or -m 8200 work, then the algorithm is not supported. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
7,370 |
05-08-2016, 09:43 AM |
|
|
Thread: Trying to crack NTLMv2
Post: RE: Trying to crack NTLMv2
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
28,836 |
05-09-2016, 05:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: Trying to crack NTLMv2
Post: RE: Trying to crack NTLMv2
No, -m 0 is MD5. Somebody needs to do some reading. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
28,836 |
05-09-2016, 06:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: Trying to crack NTLMv2
Post: RE: Trying to crack NTLMv2
Articles? How about you start by reading --help. Then if you do not understand --help, read the wiki. If you need help interpreting the wiki, read the FAQ. If you're still lost, then post your questio... |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
28,836 |
05-09-2016, 06:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: Trying to crack NTLMv2
Post: RE: Trying to crack NTLMv2
I have no idea what "SMB scanner" is, I think most people use https://github.com/SpiderLabs/Responder |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
28,836 |
05-09-2016, 07:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: Using --pw-skip --pw-limit to distribute workload
Post: RE: Using --pw-skip --pw-limit to distribute workl...
No, not 'yes to both.' Of course you can distribute work with -s/-l, that's why they are there, but -s/-l are different in hashcat & oclHashcat, you cannot distribute work between the two without some... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,100 |
05-10-2016, 04:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: Output the calculated hashes to file?
Post: RE: Output the calculated hashes to file?
Reading the output of --help or the wiki will not answer his question. oclHashcat does not support what he wants to do, because what he wants to do is braindead. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
5,481 |
05-10-2016, 04:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: Input.Mode max 8?
Post: RE: Input.Mode max 8?
You should probably show us your command line |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
7,441 |
05-10-2016, 10:34 PM |
|
|
Thread: Input.Mode max 8?
Post: RE: Input.Mode max 8?
You're using -i, that's why. You should probably know what the switches you're using mean. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
7,441 |
05-10-2016, 10:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: Input.Mode max 8?
Post: RE: Input.Mode max 8?
Oh we all knew, just wanted to verify ;) |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
7,441 |
05-11-2016, 12:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: GTX 1070 & 1080
Post: RE: GTX 1070 & 1080
How entirely unexpected :P |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
49 |
100,010 |
05-11-2016, 12:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: Input.Mode max 8?
Post: RE: Input.Mode max 8?
It's not the max, it will just take a very long time to brute force length 8 before moving to length 9 (if it ever does.) If you actually want to brute force length 10 (impossible) without brute forci... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
7,441 |
05-11-2016, 03:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: Can't crack multiple hashes, only single
Post: RE: Can't crack multiple hashes, only single
Post your example hashes with the known passwords so we can test. |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
7 |
13,888 |
05-11-2016, 07:36 PM |
|
|
Thread: Can't crack multiple hashes, only single
Post: RE: Can't crack multiple hashes, only single
I can confirm that there is a bug in 2.01, but it looks like it is fixed in beta:
Code:
--
epixoip@token:~/hashcat-3.00$ ./hashcat64.bin -d 1 -a 3 -m 110 --username --session test_cracked --quie... |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
7 |
13,888 |
05-11-2016, 08:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is cudaHashcat slower without a desktop manager?
Post: RE: Is cudaHashcat slower without a desktop manage...
You still need to run an X server even on headless machines in order to apply the timeout patch and set the appropriate perf level.
https://github.com/stricture/nvidia-drivers/blob/master/debian/t... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
3,716 |
05-11-2016, 10:19 PM |