|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Strange GPU behavior? (OC Nvidia GTX570)
Post: RE: Strange GPU behavior? (OC Nvidia GTX570)
| the patch has nothing to do with it.
overvolting and overclocking do not necessarily go hand-in-hand. overvolting is only necessary in the case of aggressive overclocking. a 130 Mhz overclock is no... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
11,426 |
01-05-2014, 10:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
Post: RE: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
| why would you use -u 320 for wpa? that doesn't make any sense. use -u 4096
Code:
--
epixoip@butters:~/oclHashcat-1.01$ ./oclHashcat64.bin -m 2500 -b
oclHashcat v1.01 starting in benchmark-mode.... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
18,769 |
01-06-2014, 07:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
Post: RE: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
| did you prepare your wordlists? |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
18,769 |
01-06-2014, 09:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
Post: RE: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
| hm, that's really weird. are you giving them enough work to do? maybe you can post the output of `s' during a run. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
18,769 |
01-07-2014, 05:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
Post: RE: WPA speed drop between 0.15 and 1.01
| ah yep, that's it. he's cracking 10 different hashes with 10 different salts. 13099 * 10 = 130990 H/s which is the expected speed. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
18,769 |
01-07-2014, 08:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Brutforce too slow? / Increment-Problems [Solved]
Post: RE: Brutforce too slow?
| you don't need to define a custom character set for a single character class. instead of
Code:
--
-1 ?d ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
--
you can simply do
Code:
--
?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d
--
of course since your mask... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
29,022 |
01-08-2014, 06:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute forcing 5-12 character WPA in practice ?
Post: RE: (kindof) Newbie questions (hardware, amazon ec...
|
futant Wrote: (01-09-2014, 03:20 AM)
--
1. Is hashcat (or oclhashcat) the best tool for the job? (cracking WPA/WPA2 handshakes).
--
Without question.
futant Wrote: (01-09-2014, 03:20 AM)
--
2. ... |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
17 |
43,217 |
01-09-2014, 03:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute forcing 5-12 character WPA in practice ?
Post: RE: (kindof) Newbie questions (hardware, amazon ec...
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
17 |
43,217 |
01-09-2014, 03:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute forcing 5-12 character WPA in practice ?
Post: RE: Brute forcing 5-12 character WPA in practice ?
| impossible to have a 5 character WPA password, minimum length for that algorithm is 8 characters.
8x R9 290X will take an average of 2.66 years to brute force an 8-character alphanumeric password (... |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
17 |
43,217 |
01-09-2014, 11:33 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute forcing 5-12 character WPA in practice ?
Post: RE: Brute forcing 5-12 character WPA in practice ?
| the notion of an ISP handing out a wifi router is rather foreign to me. is this mostly practiced in Europe? the only ISP i know that does this in the US is AT&T, with their DSL gateways which have bui... |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
17 |
43,217 |
01-09-2014, 03:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v1.01 lower WPA speed
Post: RE: v1.01 lower WPA speed
| looks like you're probably trying to crack two handshakes at once instead of one. remember that v1.00 added multi-cap support so you need to clean your cap file to ensure you're only cracking the one ... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
14,293 |
01-10-2014, 06:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute forcing 5-12 character WPA in practice ?
Post: RE: Brute forcing 5-12 character WPA in practice ?
|
futant Wrote: (01-10-2014, 10:20 AM)
--
I'm curious, is this speed very slow ?
--
it is horrendously slow. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
17 |
43,217 |
01-10-2014, 03:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: performance masks vs. wordlists
Post: RE: performance masks vs. wordlists
|
vrposter Wrote: (01-10-2014, 02:19 PM)
--
As far as I understand, there is not much of a performance difference when attacking smaller compared to larger hashlists (fast hashes) with oclHashcat.
--
... |
|
epixoip |
General Talk
|
2 |
8,544 |
01-10-2014, 03:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat64 wont work?
Post: RE: oclHashcat64 wont work?
| https://hashcat.net/wiki/ |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
10,990 |
01-10-2014, 11:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v1.01 lower WPA speed
Post: RE: v1.01 lower WPA speed
| post your command line & full output.
also, why on earth would you use -n 160 -u 1024 for wpa? should be using something more like -n 32 -u 4096 |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
14,293 |
01-11-2014, 12:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat64 wont work?
Post: RE: oclHashcat64 wont work?
| doesn't look like your gpu is supported. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
10,990 |
01-11-2014, 02:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New Build - liq cooled 7990's
Post: RE: New Build - liq cooled 7990's
| are those three radiators really enough? gpufreak has like 2802384032 radiators on his quad 7990 systems. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
11 |
20,643 |
01-11-2014, 12:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What is performance different between R9 290X and R9 290 [unlocked?]?
Post: RE: What is performance different between R9 290X ...
| 50% more cost for 36% more speed for 280X vs 290X.
for 290 vs 290X, it's about 20% more speed for 24% more cost. so yeah, it's worth it if you can afford the 290X. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
15 |
41,733 |
01-11-2014, 11:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Best long brute-force masks
Post: RE: Best long brute-force masks
| look at the hcmask files that ship with hashcat.
also the default charset & mask is pretty good at longer lengths.
and also remember -t |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
18,281 |
01-11-2014, 11:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v1.01 lower WPA speed
Post: RE: v1.01 lower WPA speed
| humor me and try again with -n 32 -u 4096 |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
14,293 |
01-11-2014, 11:34 PM |
