|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[asc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat v 0.50 "increment error"
Post: RE: Hashcat v 0.50 "increment error"
| You don't need to specify --increment-max. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
8,424 |
11-23-2015, 04:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Permission Denied
Post: RE: Permission Denied
| You also don't need to use full paths, relative paths will work just fine. Will make your command line easier to read, and easier to spot errors like this one. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
5 |
8,650 |
11-24-2015, 10:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: HD6870 & HD5970 with WPA
Post: RE: HD6870 & HD5970 with WPA
| Your -n/-u values do not make any sense. Just use -w 3 instead. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
6,490 |
11-24-2015, 01:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Multiple GPUs Help
Post: RE: Multiple GPUs Help
| 2x 970 would show the best performance. But yes, you would need to switch off SLI before using hashcat. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
7,549 |
11-24-2015, 11:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: PLEASE HELP!_MASK with 8-20 abcABC123...
Post: RE: PLEASE HELP!_MASK with 8-20 abcABC123...
|
Subcortex Wrote: (11-25-2015, 05:47 AM)
--
So please bann me, hahahaha :-p
--
Ok, done. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
14 |
20,033 |
11-25-2015, 06:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Cracking MD5 of 270 length plain-text -partially know-
Post: RE: Cracking MD5 of 270 length plain-text -partial...
| You're not going to be able to use any optimized hash cracking application for this (especially not hashcat), you'll need to use or write a cracker with a generic multiblock MD5 implementation from e.... |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
6 |
7,924 |
11-27-2015, 10:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Cracking MD5 of 270 length plain-text -partially know-
Post: RE: Cracking MD5 of 270 length plain-text -partial...
| You're not going to be able to use an optimized hash cracking app. Part of those optimizations is removing support for multiple input blocks, which limits the input to 55 bytes. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
6 |
7,924 |
11-27-2015, 10:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: .onion domain brute
Post: RE: .onion domain brute
| First, feature requests belong on Trac, not the forums. Second, generating vanity names and addresses is certainly outside the scope of Hashcat. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
5,257 |
11-28-2015, 08:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: .zip archive add support
Post: RE: .zip archive add support
| 1. Feature requests belong on Trac, not the forums.
2. There's already a ticket open for this request, https://hashcat.net/trac/ticket/161, and it has been accepted. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
5,035 |
11-28-2015, 08:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with Hashcat and large hashlists
Post: RE: Problem with Hashcat and large hashlists
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
4 |
6,342 |
11-29-2015, 05:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Need full guide on WPA/WPA2 Hashcat cracking
Post: RE: Need full guide on WPA/WPA2 Hashcat cracking
| "Full guide" is code for "I don't want to read and study." |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
10,661 |
12-01-2015, 02:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: sql login
Post: RE: sql login
|
BJENSEN Wrote: (11-30-2015, 12:18 PM)
--
But just to understand: why is it a problem to post hashes?
--
Because we said not to. It's just that simple. The only time it is appropriate to post a hash... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
11,286 |
12-01-2015, 04:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
Post: RE: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
| The 390X is not a new card -- it's just a rebranded 290X. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
10,016 |
12-01-2015, 05:27 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
Post: RE: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
| The 290X and 390X use literally the exact same GPU chip. There is zero difference in performance. The 390X might ship with a slightly higher clock, but you can bump the clock on the 290X just the same... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
10,016 |
12-01-2015, 07:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
Post: RE: oclHashcat Benchmark r9 390x
| Technically no, but also technically yes. 390X doesn't currently work with 1.37 because AMD assigned a new codename to the product, so oclHashcat can't map the codename to the appropriate kernels. But... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
10,016 |
12-01-2015, 08:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: dictionary attack problem
Post: RE: dictionary attack problem
| You cannot gain any GPU acceleration using a straight dictionary attack against fast hashes, as you have no modifier. To get GPU acceleration you must have some work for the GPU to do (add rules, use ... |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
5,291 |
12-01-2015, 09:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: dictionary attack problem
Post: RE: dictionary attack problem
| You should use cpu hashcat. That's why it exists. GPU is not always the best tool for the job. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
5,291 |
12-01-2015, 12:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: again AMD (290X/390x) vs NV GFX 970
Post: RE: again AMD (290X/390x) vs NV GFX 970
| GTX 970 is roughly the same speed as 290X while drawing half the power, and won't damage your motherboard like the 290X will. And also fuck AMD. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
4 |
6,775 |
12-02-2015, 12:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Cracking MD5 of 270 length plain-text -partially know-
Post: RE: Cracking MD5 of 270 length plain-text -partial...
| To be clear, I wasn't saying he couldn't optimize his own cracker for this task. I'm saying he can't use an existing optimized cracker like oclHashcat. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
6 |
7,924 |
12-02-2015, 04:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat GUI
Post: RE: Hashcat GUI
| Combinator attack in hashcat only accepts one wordlist, there isn't a left/right wordlist. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
3,855 |
12-03-2015, 12:44 AM |
