Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
i have now upgraded seven different machines to 13.1, and i cannot reproduce :/
atom is at a conference this week, but hopefully he will get a chance to read this thread. i'm not sure what all of th... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,725 |
02-05-2013, 05:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
Do you have the APP SDK installed? |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,725 |
02-06-2013, 09:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
atom is right, your libOpenCL is the wrong version. this is the libOpenCL that ships with 13.1:
Code:
--
epixoip@butters:~$ clinfo | grep 'Version:'
Platform Version: ... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,725 |
02-06-2013, 09:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: zip compressed wordlist
Post: RE: zip compressed wordlist
people still use zip compression? |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
6 |
13,783 |
11-07-2012, 09:51 PM |
|
|
Thread: [.Net 4.5] Leukocyte_GUI_for_oclHashcat (GUI wrapper)
Post: RE: [.Net 4.5] Leukocyte_GUI_for_oclHashcat (GUI w...
Wow, that interface is really clean. Haven't looked at the code, but the interface looks fantastic. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
19 |
35,838 |
02-27-2015, 02:46 AM |
|
|
Thread: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
Post: RE: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
using -n 160 -u 1024 will yield better performance than the defaults, yes.
if the password is in the dictionary you're using, then of course dictionary would be faster than brute force. checking more... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
15,055 |
02-25-2013, 11:38 AM |
|
|
Thread: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
Post: RE: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
first, you should be comparing your speed to "PC1", not "PC3."
second, you are benchmarking with 202 hashes, instead of one hash. this will slow down your speed by a factor of 202. 388k * 202 = 78376... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
15,055 |
02-25-2013, 11:07 AM |
|
|
Thread: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
Post: RE: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
no, it will not damage your hardware.
no, the operating system does not affect speed. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
15,055 |
02-25-2013, 02:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
Post: RE: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
ghz edition? overlclocking? |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
15,055 |
02-25-2013, 03:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
Post: RE: [ASK] About hashcat benchmark
your speed is 8750 M/s, the reference benchmark is 7500 M/s.. that 7500 M/s is using the stock clock of 925 Mhz. so if you have a ghz edition card, or are overclocking, then that explains why your car... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
15,055 |
02-26-2013, 01:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Beta] cudaHashcat-1.20 - GTX 750 TI Benchmark
Post: RE: [Beta] cudaHashcat-1.20 - GTX 750 TI Benchmark
actually i don't think there's any technical reason it shouldn't work as long as your motherboard supports PCIe MR-IOV. from a technical standpoint, i don't think this would be much different from usi... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
10 |
28,994 |
03-27-2014, 07:00 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
This is a visual bug only, it still finds the correct password. What you are seeing is not a "corrupt" hash, but rather the byte-swapped hash (SHA1 is big endian, x86 is little endian.) This is actual... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
10 |
18,754 |
02-05-2013, 08:10 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Bug 0.14] Wrong hash target [Visual Bug]
Post: RE: [Bug? 0.14] Wrong hash target
Here's some code to illustrate what is happening inside Hashcat:
Code:
--
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
uint32_t hash[5];
uint32_t bswap_hash[5];
s... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
10 |
18,754 |
02-05-2013, 08:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Copying] for a long time
Post: RE: [Copying] for a long time
https://hashcat.net/faq#how_to_create_more_work_for_full_speed |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
5 |
3,424 |
05-08-2018, 02:50 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Excel 2003] Read-only password : need second hash ?
Post: RE: [Excel 2003] Read-only password : need second ...
The modify password doesn't need to be cracked, it can simply be removed. Save an unencrypted copy of the file, then use any of the tools available on the Internet to remove the modify password. |
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
2 |
4,427 |
09-16-2015, 03:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: [HD 5870] Benchmark
Post: RE: [HD 5870] Benchmark
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
3 |
8,999 |
12-31-2013, 08:59 AM |
|
|
Thread: [HELP REQUEST]; Brute force MySQL5
Post: RE: [HELP REQUEST]; Brute force MySQL5
cool story. now take a week off to read the forum rules. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
4,943 |
01-10-2013, 04:32 AM |
|
|
Thread: [help] Unknown option --output-file= "error"
Post: RE: [help] Unknown option --output-file= "error"
because --output-file is not a valid option. read --help, read the wiki.
also you're using an old version of hashcat. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
12,624 |
02-08-2015, 12:26 AM |
|
|
Thread: [help] Unknown option --output-file= "error"
Post: RE: [help] Unknown option --output-file= "error"
The video on youtube was likely using a very old version. Read the documentation. Understand what you are typing, and why. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
12,624 |
02-08-2015, 02:04 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Help] Username:Hash to Username:Plaintext
Post: RE: [Help] Username:Hash to Username:Plaintext
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_can_i_show_previously_cracked_passwords_and_output_them_in_a_specific_format_eg_emailpassword |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,605 |
02-11-2016, 03:42 AM |