|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: .cap hash extraction
Post: RE: .cap hash extraction
| you are specifying a salted hash mode without supplying the hash and salt in "hash:salt" format. it looks like you are just concatenating the salt with the hash. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
39,551 |
08-25-2014, 12:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: .onion domain brute
Post: RE: .onion domain brute
| First, feature requests belong on Trac, not the forums. Second, generating vanity names and addresses is certainly outside the scope of Hashcat. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
5,254 |
11-28-2015, 08:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: .zip archive add support
Post: RE: .zip archive add support
| 1. Feature requests belong on Trac, not the forums.
2. There's already a ticket open for this request, https://hashcat.net/trac/ticket/161, and it has been accepted. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
5,033 |
11-28-2015, 08:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: .ZIP files? (again)
Post: RE: .ZIP files? (again)
|
epixoip |
General Help
|
2 |
5,946 |
09-08-2015, 02:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0% Progress
Post: RE: 0% Progress
| try reading the wiki and the output of -h instead of tutorials. |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
8,317 |
05-14-2014, 01:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 0% runs too fast no results
Post: RE: 0% runs too fast no results
| 100 threads? You have 100 CPU cores? |
|
epixoip |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
4,501 |
12-29-2014, 10:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.15 and problems
Post: RE: 0.15 and problems
| you're chaining too many rules together. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
43,851 |
10-22-2013, 07:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0/1 hashes recovered errorr
Post: RE: 0/1 hashes recovered errorr
| Since you're using The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali), let me put this in terms you will understand: "Try Harder." |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,138 |
02-23-2017, 03:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1 gtx1080 ti vs 2 gtx 1070
Post: RE: 1 gtx1080 ti vs 2 gtx 1070
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
2 |
3,889 |
03-20-2017, 07:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1/4 cpu cores being used
Post: RE: 1/4 cpu cores being used
| i think that's his point, is that it is using 25% cpu when he feels he shouldn't be.
however, in this example he is cracking 13.8 million hashes. and while he didn't paste his command line, he's prob... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,850 |
04-30-2013, 02:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| The numbers in your benchmark are actually a bit low. At 925 Mhz, single hash NTLM performance should be about 15700 MH/s per GPU, or 125.6 GH/s total. But actually stock clock for your 7990 should be... |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,130 |
10-20-2013, 08:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| this is more like what you should be seeing for single ntlm brute force:
Code:
--
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s
Session.Name...: oclHashcat-lite
Status.........: Running
Hash.Target..... |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,130 |
10-21-2013, 03:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| i'm just going to leave this right here...
Code:
--
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [b]ypass [q]uit => s
Session.Name...: oclHashcat
Status.........: Running
Input.Mode.....: Mask (?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a... |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,130 |
12-29-2013, 05:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| 8x R9 290X @ 1200 Mhz, Catalyst 13.12, oclHashcat 1.00 |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,130 |
12-30-2013, 01:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| i have yet to get these cards over 72C! but that said, i do get asic hangs at 1200 Mhz at stock voltage. need to adjust the voltage a tick to make them stable. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,130 |
12-30-2013, 03:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
Post: RE: 100 BHash/s NTLM mark broken on single system
| yeah in the benchmarks i did, i tested at a memory clock of 1375 since that is the 7970's default memory clock. not sure if you've seen those or not yet, but i posted a link on twitter. |
|
epixoip |
User Contributions
|
20 |
44,130 |
12-30-2013, 05:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| Everyone please note: when Flomac says "So new is always better in energy terms. And the performance of a GPU generation scales very good under hashcat. 30% more performance result in 30% more energy ... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,192 |
03-11-2017, 04:35 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| R9 Fury X was never the best.
GTX 1080 Ti and GTX Titan XP should have clock-for-clock identical performance. But it won't have the best bang for the buck. If we look at MD5 perf per dollar:
GTX... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,192 |
03-01-2017, 05:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| Well... Yes and no ;)
You're correct: you should take the total build cost into consideration. There's a reason we do not offer the GTX 1070 in the Brutalis in a clustered configuration, it throws t... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,192 |
03-02-2017, 03:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
Post: RE: 1080 TI - new best bang for buck?
| Yeah I didn't realize until later that the price points Nvidia advertised were for OEM cards, not FE. We used FE prices when calculating the new Brutalis price points.
However, if you're simply looki... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
33 |
41,192 |
03-02-2017, 08:58 PM |
