|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() -1
Post: RE: ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() -1
| I believe 15.9 was the last version that supported ancient cards. |
|
epixoip |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
8,067 |
05-31-2016, 07:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clgetdeviceids() -1 on HD5870
Post: RE: ERROR: clgetdeviceids() -1 on HD5870
| AMD no longer supports OpenCL on Windows XP. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
3 |
9,200 |
01-08-2013, 07:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clgetdeviceids() -1 on HD5870
Post: RE: ERROR: clgetdeviceids() -1 on HD5870
| you will be fine if you install win7. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
3 |
9,200 |
01-08-2013, 08:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() -1 on Ubuntu server 12.04
Post: RE: ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() -1 on Ubuntu server 12...
| Uninstall AMD APP SDK, you do not need it and should not have it installed.
This is not a hashcat issue, but rather an issue with your OpenCL runtime environment. Make sure that:
1. You are using Ca... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
3 |
10,420 |
11-19-2012, 10:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() -1 on Ubuntu server 12.04
Post: RE: ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() -1 on Ubuntu server 12...
| Just realized you said you're running Ubuntu Server. This is fine, but I suspect your issue is that you did not manually install X11. Unfortunately X11 is required for fglrx to actually communicate wi... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
3 |
10,420 |
11-19-2012, 10:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() : -1 : CL_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND Help PLz
Post: RE: ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() : -1 : CL_DEVICE_NOT_F...
| For Debian and The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) you may be able to install my Intel OpenCL .deb at https://github.com/stricture/intel-opencl/releases/tag/16.1_1.2_5.2.0.10002_... |
|
epixoip |
hashcat
|
11 |
23,740 |
09-14-2016, 08:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clGetPlatformIDs() -1001
Post: RE: ERROR: clGetPlatformIDs() -1001
| Catalyst 12.8 does not support Linux 3.5.0, so you are using the wrong disto and the wrong driver.
Further, the error means your OpenCL environment is not set up correctly, which means you probably d... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
7,167 |
01-01-2013, 06:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemAllocHost() 2
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemAllocHost() 2
| How much available host memory do you have? |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
13 |
19,373 |
09-08-2015, 07:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemAllocHost() 2
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemAllocHost() 2
| 32GB total, or 32GB free? And how many Titan X do you have?
cuMemAllocHost is returning CUDA_ERROR_OUT_OF_MEMORY so you're definitely running out of host memory at some point. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
13 |
19,373 |
09-08-2015, 12:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemAllocHost() 2
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemAllocHost() 2
| You're not answering the most important question: 32GB total, or 32GB free? Are you observing the memory utilization while running hashcat?
It's not "normal," but it all depends on what else is run... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
13 |
19,373 |
09-09-2015, 09:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemAllocHost() 2
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemAllocHost() 2
| A lot of people on the forums have reported issues and crashes on Windows 10. Might want to try another OS. |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
13 |
19,373 |
09-10-2015, 04:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemAllocHost() 2
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemAllocHost() 2
| Ok. Well in the meantime I would advise observing memory utilization while the benchmark is running, maybe you can pinpoint which algorithm is causing you to run out of RAM. Or if there's just a memor... |
|
epixoip |
Hardware
|
13 |
19,373 |
09-12-2015, 02:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
| why are you using a dictionary for that |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-14-2013, 09:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
| i'm asking you, squadx. why are you using a wordlist for that, when a mask attack would be much faster? |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-16-2013, 12:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
|
squadx Wrote: (02-16-2013, 07:25 AM)
--
because the password is a guaranteed to be a 10 digit number, no characters...instead of generating the list from 1 - 10, i do it in chunks.
How would a mas... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-16-2013, 08:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
| what algorithm, and what gpu? |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-16-2013, 09:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
| ok, well that explains why. slow algorithm, slow gpu, extremely odd settings. |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-17-2013, 02:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
| our "?d.... command" makes a huge difference on fast gpus with fast hashes. you cannot reach full acceleration with straight dictionary attacks.
your mid-level nvidia gpu is still an nvidia gpu, and ... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-18-2013, 07:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
|
squadx Wrote: (02-18-2013, 08:07 PM)
--
can you use the ?d argument and still limit it to a range? part of the benefit of creating the dictionary is being able to make a dictionary file that is wit... |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-19-2013, 05:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
| I don't think that's what he was asking for, I interpreted is question as "do I have to do 00000000 - 99999999, or can i do 90000000 - 95000000." |
|
epixoip |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
28 |
41,890 |
02-19-2013, 03:22 PM |
